Jump to content

Tamron 90mm 2.8 VC macro Canon mount on A7r II


tinplater
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has any one tried/used this combination?  Have Canon equipment too, looking for 90mm macro for the Sony A7r II.  The fact I could use the Tamron on both systems is attractive, but will I find poor compatibility on the Sony body with adapter?  Two macros for the price of around $450 vs one for around $1100 makes me really hope the Tamron is the answer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 AF Macro non VC.  I know you asked about the VC version but I thought I'd chime in since from what I've read the image quality is about the same on both.  I've had the lens for almost a year now and really enjoyed using it for both Macros and Portraits.  I originally had the Sony A7r and last month picked up a A7r II.  The IBIS of the A7rm2/A7rii really helps with macros since it's usually stopped down.  I manually set the IBIS for 90mm since I haven't found a definite answer if the Auto setting picks up that it's 90mm lens.  It should since the Metadata reports it but I set it just to be safe.  Something interesting is that in Lightroom the lens is reported as a Tamron 100mm but shows 90mm for the actual focal length.  I think it's razor sharp across the frame and doesn't show a lot of chromatic aberration with shiny things.  It has really nice colors too.  From what I understand, with the A7r II, if you get the VC version you will have to make a choice of either IBIS or VC, you can't use both.  Since you have IBIS you could get the non VC version and save a few dollars.  My version of the Tamron is a screw drive, I'm not sure if they all are, and requires the LA-EA4 A-Mount to E-Mount adapter.

 

That said... I ended up buying the Sony FE 90mm f2.8 last weekend.  After reading reviews and seeing the images everyone was posting with it I decided that IBIS + OSS would be an added benefit but more importantly I wanted Eye AF for portraits.  Having all 399 focus points is really nice too.  The Tamron (mine at least) doesn't focus that fast with the limited focus points LA-EA4 adapter and it's motor drive.   I'm happy with the Sony 90mm and am working to sell some things to help offset the cost of it.  I just posted my Tamron 90mm to Craigslist yesterday. 

 

The Tamron is a great lens as long as you are aware of it and any adapted lens weaknesses.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 AF Macro non VC.  I know you asked about the VC version but I thought I'd chime in since from what I've read the image quality is about the same on both.  I've had the lens for almost a year now and really enjoyed using it for both Macros and Portraits.  I originally had the Sony A7r and last month picked up a A7r II.  The IBIS of the A7rm2/A7rii really helps with macros since it's usually stopped down.  I manually set the IBIS for 90mm since I haven't found a definite answer if the Auto setting picks up that it's 90mm lens.  It should since the Metadata reports it but I set it just to be safe.  Something interesting is that in Lightroom the lens is reported as a Tamron 100mm but shows 90mm for the actual focal length.  I think it's razor sharp across the frame and doesn't show a lot of chromatic aberration with shiny things.  It has really nice colors too.  From what I understand, with the A7r II, if you get the VC version you will have to make a choice of either IBIS or VC, you can't use both.  Since you have IBIS you could get the non VC version and save a few dollars.  My version of the Tamron is a screw drive, I'm not sure if they all are, and requires the LA-EA4 A-Mount to E-Mount adapter.

 

That said... I ended up buying the Sony FE 90mm f2.8 last weekend.  After reading reviews and seeing the images everyone was posting with it I decided that IBIS + OSS would be an added benefit but more importantly I wanted Eye AF for portraits.  Having all 399 focus points is really nice too.  The Tamron (mine at least) doesn't focus that fast with the limited focus points LA-EA4 adapter and it's motor drive.   I'm happy with the Sony 90mm and am working to sell some things to help offset the cost of it.  I just posted my Tamron 90mm to Craigslist yesterday. 

 

The Tamron is a great lens as long as you are aware of it and any adapted lens weaknesses.

 

Cheers

Thank you!  Very helpful.  Since I would continue to shoot macro with my Canon equipment, the Tamron VC is attractive, I suspect the slow focus is the main issue.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...