Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SAR just posted a rumor about an in A99 successor coming mid September with 4K recording:

What do you think?
 

A source finally managed to gather some info about the next A-mount camera. He told me that:

– A99II was planed to be released along with the A7II back in November. But Sony decided to work on a more advanced version of the camera.
– The A99II is now scheduled to be announced in mid-September
– It has internal 4K recording and new sensor
– It will be launched along a new 24-105mm f/4.0 lens and a new Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 SSM.
– Still not sure if also the 135mm f/1.8 SSM will be announced among the A99II

 

SonyA77II_zps03eeab5e.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is excellent news and will give us A mount users a bit more breathing space for sure.  Having invested in the A mount 4 years ago, heavily in the glass department, this means I can get another 5 years plus out of my investment for sure.  Happy days.  As for the specification the A99 is a beautiful camera so anything they can improve on is only going to be a bonus for sure.

 

Si

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit that I am so happy with my a99 (had it since it was released) and used it so extensively (I am probably in the 80,000 + frames) that I really don't see why I should change it ! Granted, I don't shoot video, or seldom do. I will probably get the replacement at some point in order to have my current one replace my a900 which serves as back up... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally some good A-mount news!

For the specs:

A better AF, like the new one in the A77II would be very nice. Focus-points all over the sensor is definitely needed, not just in the centre like the A99 does.

24Mpx is still enough but a bit more wouldn't be wrong. But the ISO is more important to me. So same Mpx with half the noise on ISO 3200 is preferred.

I wouldn't buy it, if the A99II just gets much more Mpx but no improvement in the ISO.

 

And I do hope they keep the GPS in the camera, although Wi-Fi would be nice as well but it is less important than the GPS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news. Owner of an Alpha 77, Alpha 99 and Alpha 7 II and "Minoltist Veteran", I tried after some spine problems to use only the last one. With joy, last week I could come back to the A99. The A 7 II is perhaps a tiny thing, light and efficient for landscapes, macroand family pictures. For action, animals and all sorts of moving subjects, I prefer the A99. Its AF, I think gives bettter results and I own a large number of lenses with some" for me" unbearable lenses I used during long years. I hope that the A99 successor will come soon.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so tired and pissed for any new e-mount rumor or another zeiss $$$ e-lens.

 

Sony A57 - no successor. The A58 isn't better and replaced A37. 3 years of waiting for nothing.

Sony A65 - almost forgotten? Released in 2011!

Sony A77 II - APS-C top level. Oh, A-Mount is alive. But still no entry or mid-level camera. And still too expensive.

24mm plastic prime lens missing. No problem. Take a look at ebay for old minolta.

 

Normal users can't or won't pay >1000€ for lens and cam. I can't recommend Sony for any friends of mine. Going to Sony A-Mount and not Nikon (Canon) was a big mistake and pain in the ass waiting and looking for every little life signs of affordable A-Mount future.

 

And now A99 II is coming... well, if I would have the money for full frame equipment I would surely not rely on Sony A-Mount policy and twitch to N610. Same costs for less trouble.

 

Thanks for reading and sorry for my bad english.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My A99 has seen a lot of action in the past two years and i'm waiting to see what the A99ii will have to show. Like others, if it's only a heavyer sensor they add.... well i'll buy a cheaper old version and keep the older one as back-up. BUT... if they can manage to get a larger focussing zone, and a bit better focussing on lower light, wow, that would be a good argument to make me dig in my pockets... and why not improve on the ISO quality like the 7s does...  I hate having to move pictures from the laptop to external hard disk because of the volume of pics, i have 3 or 4 hard disk and hate the way my picks are spreadded around.  i dont really need a 50mg pic!!!

 

I see a lot of nice things on the A7 lineup, but with... I dont know, 15 or 16 alpha lens in stock, i dont really see the point on buying a smaller camera and having to buy a bulky adaptor in order to use the 16000$ invested in lens over the years.  So i doubt i'll ever buy the 7 line cameras... unless i strike it rich... but let's face it, i'm a photographer :P

 

My Sony alpha life started as follows : A230, A700, A580 and A99

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am one of these people, who are seriously waiting for a99II. I own two a99 bodies with total 200 000 shots or so plus number of ZA and G lens. I'm also voting for the division of a99 into a99IIs and a99IIr models. Also, Im not interested about movie options. Like Martin, I'm not fancying heavy resolution, but faster action, much better ISO and better battery life. Processing heavy files pays toll. So, here's a list, what Sony has to fix to make me buy next two bodies:

 

1. Joystick becomes unresponsive during intensive shooting. For example to change AF zones fast -- impossible.

2. High ISO capability should be improved at least 1.5 stops

3. Battery life, bigger battery or integrated battery grip. My shoots are about 500-700 shots. I attached battery grip, when  I bought the camera and never took it off.

4. AF area is too cramped to the centre

5. Overall responsiveness should be improved, sometimes hesitates to release, being in focus.

 

In general, a99 is great companion, served me well with only one failure during heavy shooting.

 

Jack-Devant-Le-Corsaire-109-1080x1080.jp

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am also waiting for the full specs on the A99 (mk2), as I, like most seasoned Sony users have accumulated a significant amount of investment in quality Sony glass that would be cumbersome on a A7R (mk2) body with adaptor.

 

But, if the only change is 4K video and a change in sensor, then I would not be interested.

 

My list would be:

1. Increase noise free ISO up to 12000

2. Increase the AF area to cover the entire image (or at least 80%)

3. WiFi remote control via the Sony app that controls all electronic functions that operate the camera

4. Removal of the Anti-aliasing filter (same as A7R)

5. Selectable sensor shift on still images. This would give the user the ability to take "snap shots" or for the serious pixel peeper a mega mega pixel image that "blows" the opposition away.

 

My 2 cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It seems entirely reasonable that they disable a video mode that requires a bit rate faster than any standard SD card can manage to an SD card (SD cards can be rated V30, V60, or V90) - if you try to record a video mode that would require something faster like a "V200" card then they don't let you.  OK, you have some non-standard hack that pretends to be an SD card, but records faster - seems perfectly sensible that they don't support it considering they look at the card to know how fast a rate the card can handle.  Pretty sure that Sony is protecting users who try to use a slow SD card to record a video mode that requires more speed than the card supports, and Sony has the camera say "you can't do that" rather than fail dismally to try to record it - can you imagine the complaints if the user got a recording that stuttered and captured a few frames then a gap then a few more frames? Feel free to complain, but don't expect sympathy. You tried  something that isn't supported, and it didn't work. As far as I know, Sony cameras are the only ones that support two different formats of cards, AND let you have two matching cards of either format. Every other camera that supports two formats has one of each. There are quite a few cameras that support two matching slots, but they only support one format of card (eg: the Z9 support two CFexpressB cards), so you don't have the option of a second format. I like the flexibility - I don't have have enough CFeA cards to cover everything - I can use CFeA for some and SD for others. Yes, CFexpressA cards were fairly expensive in the beginning (back 4 years ago in the A1), and I paid a fair bit for a Sony 180GB CFeA card. But a few years later I spent the same amount for a Lexus CFeA 320GB card, and just recently I spent almost exactly the same amount for a Prograde 480FB CFeA V4 card (which is over twice as fast to load into the computer). The price falls as there is more competition. Interestingly, measurements have shown that cameras like the Z9 cannot write at full speed to their CFeB cards (presumably because they get really hot - they write only as fast as CFeA speeds 🙂
    • If I press record when holding the camera vertically the video will be saved in 9:16 instead of 16:9 and I can't fint any option to disable that feature? It is really annoying having thumbnails being flipped 90 degrees in the editing software as well as having to flip the clips on the timeline. It is also very annoying that it is flipped when previewing the clip both in editing software but also in any media player. It happens really often when doing run and gun video (documentary style).
    • The picture profiles DO NOT affect RAW files. That's been said three times now. Even if RAW is affected by gamma, your custom settings don't affect each other, they aren't global.  Let's back up a bit. First off, which camera are you using? My A7 IV and A1 both have the ability to have completely separate profiles for video and stills.  Why can't you simply set up your video button with the settings you want and just push it? That's what I do. I can be shooting stills and if I decide to shoot video I just press the button. No need to move any switches or press any other buttons.          
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...