Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just like the title says. I have a BRAND NEW 16-35 2.8

GM, just not what I wanted and don't want to go through

the hassle of returning it, getting a refund, etc.

 

Looking for a straight up trade for a 24-70 GM

       

" ............ not what I wanted and don't want to

go through the hassle of returning it, getting

a refund  ........... " 

 

 

SMELLS ROTTEN.  

 

    

Just HOW is it LESS hassle to: 

     

1. Advertise for a rather unlikely opportunity 

2. Discuss trade with possible interested party

3. Package, ship, and insure stuff in two directions 

     

     

@ the one-post noob: 

      

If you are honest, I still would not wanna deal with 

someone so irrational ... someone who's foolish on 

at least two counts: 

     

1. Insisting on doing things assbackwards 

2. Failing to realize that, structurally, his offer reeks

of scam, stolen goods, etc, upon a casual reading.   

    

Honest-but-naive OR criminal, either way, no one 

should take up this offer. A critique such as this is 

out of place ..... in the Swap-and-Sell section. But 

this not that section. This is a discussion forum and 

so I am discussing "Internet Literacy" and just plain

common sense. 

  

Am I being harsh ? Yes. Quite intentionally.

`

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • In the old film days it made a lot of sense to invest in lenses and film than in the body.  Today, a more balanced approach is needed. Speaking of cheap lenses, what I have often noticed is great sample variability, I have two fairly good SEL 16-50 kit lens that came with my cameras, but I have tested one from a friend that was horrible, completely decentered. 
    • You are correct for the Voigtlanders I own - the aperture ring is mechanical. It tells the camera what the aperture is, but yeah, no control from the camera.
    • When I was shooting film, I used to buy an inexpensive body and pair it with an expensive lens and shoot with pro film. Now I'm doing the opposite.  The body cost so much, I've been trying to get by with inexpensive lenses with predictable results. I've also been buying some inexpensive Chinese made binoculars (actually, almost all binoculars are Chinese made) with pretty impressive performance and was hoping for the same with camera lenses. Seems I'm far more critical of the performance of camera lenses. I just ordered some lens test charts. Amazon.com : DGK Color Tools High Resolution 8.5x11" Chrome SD Professional Lens Test Chart, 3-Pack : Office And School Rulers : Electronics I don't have a really good lens to compare my cheap lenses against, but I can test them against each other and see where I need to do more shopping. There may be a price point where performance is both acceptable and affordable.  I'm hoping.  I'm pretty sure my Samyang 100mm macro lens is pretty good.  My Meike 50mm is pretty questionable.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...