Jump to content

Is Sony a7RIII the right camera for me to shot?

TheHunter

By TheHunter,
in Sony Alpha Full Frame Cameras

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheHunter Rookie

TheHunter

Posted
Posted

Hi, I always use videocameras to shot 4K documentaries around the world. I don't sell my doc. but I only project them. Usually I am in the forest, bush, remote areas to film daily like of indigenous peoples. I always tavel alone. Now I use a small camera Sony AX100 to shot in 4K. I'd like to improve the quality of image but I like a simple and immediate camera. Sometimes I shot in auto mode too because scenes follow each other quickly. I'd like to buy the new Sony a7R III but I don't know if I make an error. Maybe a videocamera is better for me than a camera like the Sony a7R III? Some suggestions please?
Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
Danze Rookie

Danze

Posted
Posted

Although I have the A7rIII, I haven't yet taken any video with it so far.

 

For video, I'd usually use the A7sII because I can shot at the native ISO at 3200 with S-Log to get the maximum 14 stops of DR. The A7rIII is supposed to have a max DR of nearly 15 stops, but you'd have to shoot at the native ISO at 100. So it really depends if you need 15 stops of DR or 3200 ISO.

 

The Sony A7rIII and A7sII only use 8bit 4:2:0 codec right now, unless you record with an external recorder like the Atoms Shogun, you will get up to 8bit 4:2:2 codec. If you only use it for video, I'd suggest you to wait for the A7sIII, rumoured to be out in 2018, maybe Sony will be pressured to match Lumix GH5's 4K 10bit 4:2:2 codec. Also the GH5s coming out this week is rumoured to be a GH5 with high ISO like the A7sII.

Link to post
Share on other sites
bennytan Apprentice

bennytan

Posted
Posted

If budget allows, Sony is starting to discount the FS5, which is a great and simple run-and-gun camera. 10-bit in 1080, with S-Log, HDR (HLG), dual card slots and a more modular form factor that allows attachments of mics and accessories.

 

The kit 18-105mm is acceptable at best; I'd look into the Sony FE lineup, the 18-110, or a Fuji 18-55mm for a simple kit.

 

I frequently work with the a7R, a7S and FS5, and they do match together extremely well, and you'll find it easy to adapt if you're already invested in the Sony ecosystem.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TheHunter Rookie

TheHunter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If budget allows, Sony is starting to discount the FS5, which is a great and simple run-and-gun camera. 10-bit in 1080, with S-Log, HDR (HLG), dual card slots and a more modular form factor that allows attachments of mics and accessories.

 

The kit 18-105mm is acceptable at best; I'd look into the Sony FE lineup, the 18-110, or a Fuji 18-55mm for a simple kit.

 

I frequently work with the a7R, a7S and FS5, and they do match together extremely well, and you'll find it easy to adapt if you're already invested in the Sony ecosystem.

 

I thank you for your info but unfortunately I don't shot in HD but only in 4K. Do you think it is better a7R or a7S for video?

Link to post
Share on other sites
slackercruster Contributor

slackercruster

Posted
Posted

OP...you have the advantage of being able to shoot hi quality stills with the Sony as well as video. If you don't care about the still option, then it is as you like. If a dedicated video cam will giv you beter results, go with it.

 

Very nice videos you make!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1Wolfphotography Newbie

1Wolfphotography

Posted
Posted

Just tossing this in there.  I know we are talking about FF cameras but Given your circumstances that you typical shoot in. I can make a Valid Argument to get yourself a Sony RX10IV 

24mm-600mm Range covers all of your bases. 1"Sensor 4K recording. Up to 960 FPS for super duper Slow mo.... 
f2.4-4  variable aperture...  600mm f4 come on where are you going to get one of these and still carry it on your neck?
Compact all in one design. No worry about about dust or dirt on the sensor while you are out in the field. 
Wifi and NFC smartphone connectivity. 

    It's no A7S in terms of Mastering Low Light, but certainly always ready for whatever you throw at it. No need to change lenses to get that Super Wide 24mm angle when you are zoomed in at 600mm
  20MP stills
Weather sealed body for less than $1600

    Travels well no need for extra lenses, Sensor swabs, and all of the other stuff you need for ICL cameras.

    Just something to consider. 

Mark OneWolf
1WP

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Jaf-Photo

Guest Jaf-Photo

Posted
Posted

The AX100 is hard to beat in terms of practicality vs decent image quality. So you would primarily be looking for a big leap in image quality, I guess. The bigger sensors and better dynamic range of the current A7 series would lead to some improvement. But I think the sensible thing is to be patient for the A7sIII. Sony reasonably should try to match the competition by boosting the specs, rather than protect their camcorder range by crippling it. All of their recent cameras have been cutting edge except for video specs. But that would be the role of the A7sIII.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jaf-Photo

Guest Jaf-Photo

Posted
Posted

The specs for A7sIII havent been released yet.

 

Given the popularity of the GH5 with 4K60, it would be foolish of Sony to stay at 4K30, which is what the A7-series currently has.

 

The best thing is to wait and see.

 

Yes, but shooting in 25p mode in UHD. I never would buy another stroboscopic 25p camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Cameratose
      Upgrading to a bigger setup. Need some advice!

      By Cameratose · Posted

      Wow, we have two distinctly different trains of thought. I'm not sure how valuable my advice will be, just consider this something to toss around in the back of your mind. First off, I hate rangefinder style bodies, never could get on with them. The decision of whether to go with a full-size body wasn't even in play. The difference when looking at size comparison photos is considerable, the difference in practical use is minor. About the only time I can think of that it may be beneficial is street if you want to conceal yourself a bit.  Lenses: Size and weight don't bother me near as much as inconvenience. Who in the heck wants to be changing lenses all the time? I take a short zoom, a long zoom, and a medium-wide fast prime for indoors. That's it. I am hoping Sigma's 20-200 set to be released tomorrow isn't a turd, if it's decent it will replace my 24-105.  If I were to go on a trip today, my setup would be: A1 70-200/2.8 GM II 24-105 Samyang 24/1.8.  If I was feeling it, I might add the 2X TC for the GM II, but I doubt it'd even get used.  An alternative to the 70-200 + TC would be the Tamron 50-400.  BOTH of these setups fit nicely in my Tenba Solstice 10L Sling.  So, I would say yes. Trade up to the A7R V. Definitely get the 24-70, or maybe the 24-105 for more range. You don't need 2.8 for your described subject matter.  As an aside, I never, ever, ever shoot in crop mode. Why? Well, I can do the exact same thing in post on my computer. They're both just electronic crops. I end up with a lot more information that way, and who knows, if I'm going to crop anyway, maybe there's a better composition hidden in the full frame image that I didn't see when I made the shot? Much easier to remove content than to add it.  
    • Gionam
      Upgrading to a bigger setup. Need some advice!

      By Gionam · Posted

      Hi all, For about the last 1.5 years I've been using the Sony a7CR combined with the 24-50mm f2.8 G lens as one of the lenses that basically lives on my camera. Besides this I have the following lenses as well: Sony 16-25mm f2.8 G Sony 14mm f1.8 GM Sony 40mm f2.5 G Sigma 85mm f1.4 On my last travel I took the above mentioned lenses with me + the 24-50 G. Would have most likely taken the Sony 14mm f1.8 GM but I didn't own this yet at the time. For my next travel I do want to take this as well so then my setup would look like: Sony 24-50mm f2.8 G Sony 16-25mm f2.8 G Sony 40mm f2.5 G Sigma 85mm f1.4 Sony 14mm f1.8 GM At this point I feel like I'm kinda reaching a bit of a limit in terms of lenses I want to take with me during travel, especially the 85mm. I wish to use it more but noticed I often left it at the hotel/apartment room I was staying at. Initially I bought the a7CR for weight savings but as time has passed I do feel certain limits with the setup especially during travel/landscape (as this is my main form of photography). And that's mainly coming from the amount of lenses I'm taking. I have been considering to trade in the 24-50 G lens to the 24-70 GMII to use on my a7CR but after using my Sigma 85mm f1.4 for an extended time on my a7CR it does feel uncomfortable to use due to the front heavy nature of the setup. The 24-70 GMII would be about the same weight as the Sigma. One option would be to use the extended grip on my a7CR, this certainly makes handling a lot better of bigger lenses but I usually have my setup hanging from the Peak Design Capture Clip on my backpack and I'm not sure if the extended grip really designed to take this much weight to be fair. Maybe anyone here has experience with this? So what this leads me to was the consideration to upgrade to the a7RV + Sony 24-70 GMII as there are some good trade in deals going on right now where I'm at. I'm not sure is this setup an absolute overkill for a hobbyist photographer... :) The benefits of this upgrade would be to have less need for changing lenses during travel and reduce the amount of separate lenses I have to take with me. The overall weight would however be approx. the same that goes in my backpack. Usually when I'm out for hikes I will currently only take the 16-25 & 24-50 with me. With this setup the reach feels limiting even with cropping the 50mm to 75mm (still approx. 26MP on the a7CR after crop). What I usually use my setup for: Landscape photography Travel Portrait Astrophotography I was wondering is there anyone here who went from a lighter a7CR (or similar) setup to a slightly heavier setup to carry around during hikes etc. Did you regret it or was the tradeoff worth it? As mentioned I do feel like my current setup is somewhat limiting and realized that switching lenses during travel is an absolute pain in the ass. But I'm not sure if the extra 450gr (about 1 lb) is worth the tradeoff. I know the decision is ultimately up to me but just like to hear your thoughts on this upgrade, and if the additional features & image quality in trade for weight would be worth it as well. TL;DR: Looking to upgrade my a7CR 24-50G f2.8 setup to a7RV with 24-70GMII f2.8 lens, not sure if it's worth it with the additional weight in trade for more versatility and better IQ. Thanks in advance for your replies!
    • Wolvy
      a68 Soft Focus Problem

      By Wolvy · Posted

      I got one tuned up pretty well last year. I don’t remember exactly after doing a 77ii not too far apart that was different. The a68 was faster and more accurate but color profile was more work to tune btw. profile/style set to clear and highest sharpness allowed + micro focus adjustments per lens if I remember right. And any of these fall apart fast in low light or slow lenses. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...