Jump to content

Recommended Posts

28-85 .... that's what they make 28-85 zooms for :-) 

I suppose you enjoyed asking her to hold that pose

while you managed all that lens swapping ? 

  

Just joking. Really nice work. Surely you have more ? 

 

And an afterthought: Suppose you combine mosaic

and zebra effects .... the patterns in collision, etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to subscribe to your gallery location at

yahoo. It looked very promising but it required

me to provide more personal data than what

I'd consider reasonable. Either I am uniquely

reticent about such things, or you and other

participants are limiting your audience to only

those who are quite carefree, or irresponsible,  

concerning their personal data. C'est la vie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to subscribe to your gallery location at

yahoo. It looked very promising but it required

me to provide more personal data than what

I'd consider reasonable. Either I am uniquely

reticent about such things, or you and other

participants are limiting your audience to only

those who are quite carefree, or irresponsible,  

concerning their personal data. C'est la vie.

 

This is Flickr registration process you can input fake data if you wish only a valid email address is required (you can create an alternate one for this kind of site)

otherwise click here to see my portfolio

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...