Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This tiny lens - and I mean really tiny: I happened to loose it more than once inside the old big DSLR bag! - turned out to be one of my favorite.

 

It is pretty impressively sharp - especially considering the focal length - and has beautiful tonalities. This is the first version, so you cannot mount filters on it. With the possible exclusion of seascapes (if you want to use something like a ND1000, to be clear) I don't find this to be a big deal; with such a vast angle of view a polarizer would be out of the question; I don't use other filters anyway. And if you need a split-ND to recover the light in the sky you can always just shot two frames and blend the exposure (way better that a split ND for my taste, but YMMV).

 

My only gripe is that in some occasion - my guess at some specific focusing distance - it looks like it exhibits some kind of weird "blob" of unsharpness mid-frame. I said "it looks like" because I've not yet be able to replicate the behavior on purpose, and I have a doubt that it may have been some kind of adapter-related problem. Now I bought a new ring that looks of much better quality, so time will tell.

 

Please note that all the images in color have been processed with the Flat Field Lightroom plugin to eliminate the notorious magenta shading at the borders.

 

 

Narrow path, "Fossiata" forest, Italy

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Dark woods, "Fossiata" forest, Italy

 

Cave at "Lampetia" cape, Cetraro, Italy

 

Gorge at the "Fossiata" forest, Italy

 

Creek and crumbled old bridge, "Fossiata" forest, Italy

 

Window and night clouds

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

 

My only gripe is that in some occasion - my guess at some specific focusing distance - it looks like it exhibits some kind of weird "blob" of unsharpness mid-frame

 

I bought this a while ago to use with my Bessa L.  All the quirks one struggles with it on FF digital were all there on film as well.  It works superbly at very close ranges (~5cm range).  Everywhere esle it is down right crappy as an useful lens.  Of course, everyone is taken by its dimunitive size and never gets rid of it- just like me. 

 

That is my honest opinion based on years of struggle with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought this a while ago to use with my Bessa L.  All the quirks one struggles with it on FF digital were all there on film as well.  It works superbly at very close ranges (~5cm range).  Everywhere esle it is down right crappy as an useful lens.  Of course, everyone is taken by its dimunitive size and never gets rid of it- just like me. 

 

That is my honest opinion based on years of struggle with this one.

 

Actually my sample is pretty darn sharp, into the corners as well (just a bit of ca, but basically no smearing), even on my A7r. To be absolutely sure about this in all conditions I will have to shoot more (I've had the camera since just a few days), but for now I'm really happy with the Heliar performance.

 

My guess is that, like with many lenses, especially from third-party manufacturers, there is a ton of sample variation. With the 1st version there is also the problem that you will have to use not one, but two adapters (m39 > m | m > Sony) potentially multiplying the problems.*

 

And I don't usually shot macros, but in this you're absolutely right: this lens, with an helicoid adapter, is absolutely fantastic.

 

 

*yes, you could use just a m39 > Sony adapter, but for simplicity sake and to be able to use the helicoid adapter I "converted" the lens to Leica M, and I suspect many others did the same

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would add that creating/applying LCC profiles in Capture One also goes a long way to correcting the corners as well. 

 

Thanks, good to know. I don't use much CO because its bad (in my book) habit of littering the file system with its many files, but certainly there are many "devotees" out there that will appreciate the tip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with my sample at all.  I have compared it with a few.  Anyway if you are satisfied with yours, nothing else matters. :)

 

Long before I went digital, I was using it on a Bessa (and other) cameras. Also with extension tubes.  There is an old device that allows for focus check on ground glass.  Pretty neat set up.  The 5cm closeups were mostly made on Provia.

 

BTW, beware of the helicoid stuff for Sony.  Even the latest version of Hawk adapter will induce vignetting with the Cosina 15mm.  The cheaper knock offs (or the Cosina made one) are much worse.

 

You are better of with a Sony LTM adapter.

 

(FWIW, the Cosina 12/5.6 is a better lens.  Also best used with a LTM adapter)

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the first few pictures I've managed to take with the A7r the 15 seems to perform actually better on its less demanding (in terms of pixel pitch) sensor than on the Nex 7 one. But for a final judgement I'll have to use the setup quite a bit more.

 

Thanks for the info about the vignetting with the helicoid tube   :)   

 

I usually give a quick test to all my lenses when I buy a new camera, before shooting "the good stuff", but I hadn't thought of testing the adapter for this.

 

Anyway I don't trust the helicoid adapter for general photography, and I use it only as a telescopic macro tube.

 

From what I've seen so far you're quite right that the 12 is a better lens, unfortunately is too large (in degrees) for my taste. Well, the 15 is too large as well, but I originally bought it because it was nice to have my preferred focal length equivalent (24mm) on the Nex 7, and now I've grown to like a lot the "large view" in the close-up shots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • From my records, Minolta made about 8500 85mm F 1.7 lenses bearing the MD badge. The MC-X version was slightly double that. So these are not that rare. I just saw an ad for a Limited Rare MD 45mm F2 lens ( Minolta made over a million of these) so the word rare is often used in a bizarre way. Seeing that the OP has a MD ROKKOR-X version and that he appears to have bought it from Europe is kind of unusual since the ROKKOR-X versions were to be sold exclusively in America. So in Europe, this lens naming was rare.  I think the confusion about a reworked version may come from the fact that during the MC-X era (1972-76), Minolta made numerous changes to their lens line-up. First they changed the lens Mount Index dot which was initially painted like their previous series of lenses but after about 1 year, they replaced this with a slightly larger diameter plastic bead. This change happened around the introduction of the X-1, XM, XK bodies. Then they removed the small Stop Down Levers that were on most lenses up to now around 1975 since their SR T and XK/XE bodies were now boasting a Stop down mechanism. Then a little later Minolta even removed the lens formula (in this case PG) designation from the lens markings. This may have caused people to believe there was some kind of modification to the lens when it was only a marking  change. Also around 1973-74 they decided to provide a different marking for lenses sold in America ( at least USA and Canada) to identify lenses sold on the grey market that was often cause for confusion with consumers buying a great deal they could not get repaired under warranty. Same applies to Bodies starting in the same era where  X-1 was for Asian market, XK for American market and X-M for rest of the world, then SR T 102 in America, SR T Super in Asia and SR T 303 in rest of the world. So you could find all of the following with their respective front markings: - MC-II: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL) This type has the hills and valleys metal focusing ring -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Painted Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X marking for the American market) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (Orange colored ROKKOR-X again for the American market) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (White colored ROKKOR-X ( iguess orange paint was getting too expensive) ) It was then replaced with the MD-II MD ROKKOR (X) 85mm F 2 There was no MD-I version of this lens and the same with a few lenses with large apertures ( 35mm F 1.8, 58mm F 1.2, 300mm F 4.5) since they had issues with the speed of the aperture mechanisms closing down for what was  a last minute check on XD/XD-7 and XD-11 bodies requiring stopping the lens down just prior to the shutter opening to ensure accurate exposure. Some late MC-X lenses may have had the modified aperture mechanism causing the confusion that there was an updated version but the optical formula seems to indicate there was no change.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • It could probably be used directly on the A7R ( or any other body using the Sony MIS shoe) in manual mode provided it can be positioned properly in spite of the zillion contacts Sony placed on these bodies at the front of the shoe which may prevent the shoe from making proper contact at the center. If proper central contact is not achieved, using a ADP-MAA adapter topped by a Minolta FS-1100 will do the trick. Tried it with older flashes like 360PX and a few others and it works. The issue with using it in Manual Mode is that due to the very short distances involved, calculating the proper aperture for correct exposure is a challenge. Add to this that the assist lights will not operate the way they were designed if at all.
    • I've found some great lenses that way too -- like a Tokina 24-200mm AF zoom on a Maxxum 5 for $20.  I sold the camera for $40 and kept the lens.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...