Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can you guys help me compare the optical quality of Sony 16-70mm f4 with Sigma 18-50mm f2.8? I'm interested in sharpness, color as well as bokeh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity, why don't you include the Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 in your comparison? My assumption would be that you value compactness over all else. If not, the Tamron is a vastly better option than the Zony 16-70, which is very dated and was already mediocre and overpriced at release.

Unless you need 16 and/or 70mm, I'd go with the Sigma over the Zony if you value minimal size. It's better in pretty much every aspect, has a faster aperture and is generally cheaper, though it lacks stabilization. Might not be an issue though if you have an A6(5/6/7)00.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seek out image samples. There are plenty of other places like Fred Miranda and Dyxum that have threads dedicated to specific lenses. You can also watch reviews. The problem with your question is that unless you actually find someone who has direct experience with both lenses, then our opinions are based on the same information that you can find. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thinking about control of images in low light with blur and movement I would like to experiment more with me manually varying aperture during a shot. With a manual lens this allows me to start with a small aperture and collect some fluidity and then snap lens to much larger aperture to give a more solid defined image. To date in a few quick trials I have just used a fixed exposure time judged by seeing exposure at a few apertures and then just trying my dexterity. A next step up would be that the camera closes the shutter when it has accumulated enough light. Maybe some long exposure /astronomy contexts might do that sort of thing....? To help imagine I'm thinking musicians in a bar, animals in low light, individuals in motion in some context. Mostly I seem to need near 1s exposure to synch my aperture change and have enough time. A de-clicked lens or one with a loose aperture ring would help (maybe I have at home on the shelf) but I am away with just 2 old Olympus lenses and TBH the aperture rings are a bit stiff and close to the focus ring... Any thoughts or suggestions?
    • Friends don't let friends use Luminar. They lie, their DAM is either non-existent or garbage. They tell you it's a one-time purchase with free updates for the life of the program. Problem is, they bring out a whole new program every year or two, then they stop 'updating' or even supporting the old one. They give away the last version free to suck you in to the next one. I tried them a while back and went through the entire process. When I removed it from my computer (after I cancelled my sale on the new version) I had to delete 36,000 sidecar/thumbnails of my photos, most of which I had never even opened in Luminar. It just went into my folders and automatically created all of these files.  There are many decent programs out there you can get that will stand head and shoulders above Luminar.  
    • I am considering purchasing the Luminar editing program for IOS to use with my A7iv; however in listing which cameras are compatible, there is this statement: "Sony vcb cropped p send-raw format is not currently supported."  Does anyone know if this means that the program will not work with raw photos?  Has anyone successfully used this program editing raw photos? 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...