Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just purchased an A99 II and I need a flash for it. I do have an old HVL-F58AM, but it requires an adapter to use with this camera, & I don't know if camera can fully control it. Plus, it is big and heavy, which is what I want to avoid.

I did purchase a Westcott FJ80SE, but the base literally broke the first time I used it. It felt cheap from the second that I pulled it out of the box. In talking with someone at B&H, they initially recommended the Sony HVL-F28RM, as I rarely need a flash beyond 10 feet. I was thinking of getting the Sony HVL-F46RM, however, in case I ever needed the extra power.

So, which one of those would work best? B&H said that the Godox would be even weaker at the base than the Westcott, so I would like to avoid them. Let me know what you think. Thanks in advance.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1592781-REG/sony_hvl_f28rm_external_flash.html

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1668143-REG/sony_sony_hvl_f46rm_wireless_radio.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The one Sony flash I owned was a piece of junk (HSL-F20M).  I now only use Godox flashes.  For an on camera flash I use a Godox TT350S which takes 2 x AA batteries.  For off camera flashes I use Godox TT685S flashes that take 4 x AA batteries.  I don't use a flash often enough to keep track of and put up with proprietary batteries.  The TT350S is perfect for my fill flash needs.  I rarely need to light up an entire scene, I usually just need to add some extra light to a portion of the photo.  Usually just need a bit of fill for people / faces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeInOr said:

The one Sony flash I owned was a piece of junk (HSL-F20M).  I now only use Godox flashes.  For an on camera flash I use a Godox TT350S which takes 2 x AA batteries.  For off camera flashes I use Godox TT685S flashes that take 4 x AA batteries.  I don't use a flash often enough to keep track of and put up with proprietary batteries.  The TT350S is perfect for my fill flash needs.  I rarely need to light up an entire scene, I usually just need to add some extra light to a portion of the photo.  Usually just need a bit of fill for people / faces.

 

My Sony uses AA batteries.  I had a Godox, but it was extremely flimsy at the mounting point (it actually broke).  My Sony is a lot stronger in that area and seems to be working fine whenever I need to use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Godox TT685 and V860 flashes have a metal shoe available for them which is a lot stronger than the default plastic shoe.

I haven't had a problem with the plastic shoes on my Godox flashes and prefer to stay with the plastic.  If I have an accidental drop or fall I want my flash to break instead of my camera hot shoe.  It is really easy and cheap to replace the hot shoe on the TT685... the hotshoe on my A7RIV, not so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...