Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One aspect of photography that I enjoy is black-and-whte imaging. I'm intrigued by the Leica Monochrom 246 (24 MP), but I wonder if the Sony A7r ii with 42 megapixels might give the same IQ with B&W conversion in Lightroom/Photoshop/Silver FX? Let's assume the same lens is used. Would the A7r ii have better dynamic range?  

 

Please don't go off on a flame about how foolish/expensive it is to think of buying a Monochrom...that's not the question I'm asking here. How might these two cameras compare for B&W photography?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a very subjective thing. You could spend all day comparing pixel by pixel....and you could argue either way. In my opinion, the monochrom is a specific tool designed to do what it does in a way that Leica users traditionally appreciate. It's way out of my price range admittedly, so I have to make do :-) with an older M8 which is still a delight to use, especially in B&W.... And I struggle to get that particular Leica sensor 'look' with my A7ii, but the A7ii is much more versatile as a camera in situations the M8 struggles with (macro for instance), so the Sony gets most use. The Sony also has the advantage of working really well with so many different legacy lenses. If I were to just be shooting B&W and sticking to street or studio work, then I would have to say the Leica Monochrom experience would be for me a more appropriate camera to use, especially when matched with Leica lenses. Outside of that, as a general purpose camera, then the A7r2 is going to be a better tool and be more versatile across a wider range of uses.

 

Hopefully, someone wealthy (or lucky enough to have access to both cameras) will come along and read your post, and do a full side by side comparison for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've owned both the a7 and the M240 (not the Monochrom, but they are similar in use).

 

The Monochrom will deliver the more traditional Leica experience, if you just want it to work like a traditional rangefinder.  However, if you want to use Leica R glass, or take long tele shots (over 135mm), or take macro shots -- then you'll need to use the low-res Leica EVF.  And the EVF will mean a shorter battery life, which means you'll need additional backup power bricks.  The EVF also can compensate for other issues like back-focus, so once you begin to use it, it's tough to go back to using the big digital Leica as you would a rangefinder.

 

Other things to consider include the weight (the Monochrom is heavier than the a7RII), the megapixel count (24 MP versus 42 MP), and the reliability in the field (the big digital Leicas have had a tendency to lock up repeatedly with use in the field; this can be fixed by removing the battery and putting it back in, but this shouldn't ever happen with a camera that costs 7 large).  Is the Leica a nice camera?  Yes.  Can it deliver images comparable to the a7RII?  Debatable, as the a7RII images can be tweaked via the individual color channels, and that's missing with the non-color RAW files from the Monochrom.

 

I found the a7 to be much easier to deal with in almost every aspect than the M240; the a7 RAW files had greater depth for shadow recovery, the entire a7 package was lighter, the a7 EVF was better, and my a7 monochrome conversions had better depth.

 

My experience with the M240 was such that I got rid of it after 12 months of use and I will just go with the Sony offerings from this point forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had the Sony A7R, and now have the A7RII. The newer camera offers a much improved B&W image IMHO. Getting a beautiful B&W image requires very subtle mid-tones, as explained by Thorsten von Overgaard, and that is what A7RII does very well indeed. But, as he also states, the Monochrom Typ 246 struggles in zone X (strong lighting, as in ETTR), whereas the Sony does not. So, yes, in theory you should have significantly better dynamic range. Try one out and make a couple of quick pics, and see whether you like the look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • From my records, Minolta made about 8500 85mm F 1.7 lenses bearing the MD badge. The MC-X version was slightly double that. So these are not that rare. I just saw an ad for a Limited Rare MD 45mm F2 lens ( Minolta made over a million of these) so the word rare is often used in a bizarre way. Seeing that the OP has a MD ROKKOR-X version and that he appears to have bought it from Europe is kind of unusual since the ROKKOR-X versions were to be sold exclusively in America. So in Europe, this lens naming was rare.  I think the confusion about a reworked version may come from the fact that during the MC-X era (1972-76), Minolta made numerous changes to their lens line-up. First they changed the lens Mount Index dot which was initially painted like their previous series of lenses but after about 1 year, they replaced this with a slightly larger diameter plastic bead. This change happened around the introduction of the X-1, XM, XK bodies. Then they removed the small Stop Down Levers that were on most lenses up to now around 1975 since their SR T and XK/XE bodies were now boasting a Stop down mechanism. Then a little later Minolta even removed the lens formula (in this case PG) designation from the lens markings. This may have caused people to believe there was some kind of modification to the lens when it was only a marking  change. Also around 1973-74 they decided to provide a different marking for lenses sold in America ( at least USA and Canada) to identify lenses sold on the grey market that was often cause for confusion with consumers buying a great deal they could not get repaired under warranty. Same applies to Bodies starting in the same era where  X-1 was for Asian market, XK for American market and X-M for rest of the world, then SR T 102 in America, SR T Super in Asia and SR T 303 in rest of the world. So you could find all of the following with their respective front markings: - MC-II: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL) This type has the hills and valleys metal focusing ring -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Painted Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index changed around 1973-74) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X marking for the American market) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR-X PG 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X ) -MC-X: MC ROKKOR 1:1.7 f=85mm ( with No SDL and Plastic Bead Lens mount index and no more PG lens formula index, Orange colored ROKKOR-X) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (Orange colored ROKKOR-X again for the American market) -MD-II: MD ROKKOR-X 85mm 1:1.7 ø55mm (White colored ROKKOR-X ( iguess orange paint was getting too expensive) ) It was then replaced with the MD-II MD ROKKOR (X) 85mm F 2 There was no MD-I version of this lens and the same with a few lenses with large apertures ( 35mm F 1.8, 58mm F 1.2, 300mm F 4.5) since they had issues with the speed of the aperture mechanisms closing down for what was  a last minute check on XD/XD-7 and XD-11 bodies requiring stopping the lens down just prior to the shutter opening to ensure accurate exposure. Some late MC-X lenses may have had the modified aperture mechanism causing the confusion that there was an updated version but the optical formula seems to indicate there was no change.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • It could probably be used directly on the A7R ( or any other body using the Sony MIS shoe) in manual mode provided it can be positioned properly in spite of the zillion contacts Sony placed on these bodies at the front of the shoe which may prevent the shoe from making proper contact at the center. If proper central contact is not achieved, using a ADP-MAA adapter topped by a Minolta FS-1100 will do the trick. Tried it with older flashes like 360PX and a few others and it works. The issue with using it in Manual Mode is that due to the very short distances involved, calculating the proper aperture for correct exposure is a challenge. Add to this that the assist lights will not operate the way they were designed if at all.
    • I've found some great lenses that way too -- like a Tokina 24-200mm AF zoom on a Maxxum 5 for $20.  I sold the camera for $40 and kept the lens.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...