Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone any experience with using Pentax 645 lenses on a Sony A7 and if so, which adapter works and what results/limitations did you find?

 

Having my A7Rii waiting for the Batis 25mm to come into stock, I am wondering how I can use my 645 lenses

 

Appreciate all input

 

Thanks

 

Phil

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you see this one - https://www.fotodioxpro.com/lens-mount-adapter-pentax-645-p645-mount-lenses-sony-emount-mirrorless-camera.html

 

Anyone tried it?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

 

I have seen reference it that, but can't get it in the UK.  Would prefer a direct adaptor, but he combination of Fotga and photodiode is working ok so far,  

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's probably not a large enough market for it, but a speedbooster version so all of the lens gets used could provide amazing quality with no compromise on aperture (MF lenses are never wider than f2.8, most are over f4).

The usefulness wil depend on the use.  There will be a 'crop factor' involved, but don't know definitively what.  The Pentax digital sensors are 44 x 33 in comparison to the 36 x 24 of the Sony.  I wouldn't be able to use 645 lenses on it t the exclusion of the FE lenses I have, but the 120mm f/4 macro I have should be crazy sharp on the mkII.  Manual focussing isn't an issue for me in any case...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking in the context of being my backup camera. So when travelling I will carry the Sony and Batis 25mm as backup for the 645Z (and use the Sony for the times I want a light carry round camera). Now if i have a problem with the 645Z, it would be ideal to supplement the wide angle Batis with the 645Z lenses, so an adapter is desired :-)

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...