Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, As an ex Canon shooter I always turned the IS off when on a tripod so does the same apply for Sony steady Shot? Yesterday in a wooded area while it was pouring from the heavens and overcast I had to use a 50th second in manual mode on the A9 and the 200-600mm lens, on a gimbal and auto ISO set to max 6400, yes noise arrived but also some images where just not sharp at all, animals never stay still for long I no but 50th sec is not mega slow. Any advice on better settings for this type of situation? Thankyou, Russ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Russ,

I think that having the steady shot on or off isn't the problem here. Since you are using the 200-600 mm zoom, the conventional wisdom says your shutter speed should be the reciprocal or 1/200 to 1/600 of a second for shutter speed. It is a good rule of thumb for minimizing the shake. When on a tripod this rule is not as critical but shooting on a tripod can sometimes introduce its own problems. Depending on your tripod, the head, and other factors like the wind, vibrations and harmonics can have a way of introducing shake to your shooting even though you are on a tripod. Do a test if you would and shoot a distant subject at various shutter speeds and then do the same test again but this time put a small bean bag or weight on the lens. I have done this with several of my students and everyone was surprised when the shots with the bean bag came out sharper i.e. less camera shake. If you don't use something like a bean bag, even putting your hand on the lens can minimize harmonic vibrations. You may have to use even high shutter speeds to eliminate harmonic vibrations as opposed to the shutter speeds to eliminate your hand held movements. David 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David, Thank you for your reply. Yes I no about the mm to ss but due to the very low light it was impossible to get there unless putting the ISO through the roof, good tip on the bag I will have to try that. I do use a LensMaster Gimbal RH-2 on a Manfrotto tripod but on this occassion I think it was being unable to get a high enough shutter speed, maybe a touch of flash would have been better but don't like to use it when wildlife are the subject. Thanks again Russ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...