Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found a lens mount adaptor that allows me to mount my Pro Broadcast Video Power Zoom Lenses on my Sony A7II Camera. I realize there is a problem with this adaptation as even in sensor crop mode these lenses cannot cover the camera's sensor. As a pro Video Person, I would love to have a Sony A7 tupe camera with a 2/3 inch sensor appropriate to my video lenses. Anyone who watches pro sports on TV has been watching the quality of imagery that can be captured with these small sensors that can Zoom from an image of a whole stadium to a close-up of the expression on the quarterback's face. This would make a great wildlife videographer's kit. There is no need for a giant video camera anymore to achieve great closeup imagery.  All you need is a Sony Alpha 7 series camera with a 2/3 inch sensor and a small battery box to power the Zoom lens and maybe even enable the auto aperture capability of the lens. There is another way to achieve this desired result. With the increasing density of sensor chips I can visualize a Sony with greater than APS crop factor and clear image zoom that could get the job done

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds interesting. 8-). It also sounds like the adaptor you're using doesn't provide the necessary distance to the sensor, i.e. is too short. If that's the case. it might be worthwhile experimenting with some extension tubes, like one of those.

Could you please post a closeup of the naked adaptor only, plus one resulting image as shot with your setup?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Distance to sensor is not a problem. Goes together perfectly. B4 lenses (The broadcast standard mount were designed for using three sensors for red, blue, and green colors mounted behind a set of prisms that separated the light into three beams filtered for the primary colors. The imagers were originally electron tubes wirh phosphors that were scanned by electron beams. These were either plumbicon or saticon tubes. The cameras were quite large and power hungry to power the high voltage electronics. The tubes were later replaced by CCD imagers. Due to the prisms, the imager is set pretty far back from the mount allowing adaptation to some mirrorless Still Camera lenses. Sensor technology has evolved such that prism separation for colors is no longer necessary and sensors can achieve HD video on tiny chips as evidenced by GoPro Cameras

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by videofilm
adjust image size
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your detailed answer, which - frankly - leaves me more puzzled than before.

I see quite a "gap" between your sample image, which apparently covers only a fraction of the sensor, with heavy falloff towards the outside and less than perfect sharpness on the one hand, and the superb 4K image quality that you seem to be aiming at on the other hand. How are you planning to close that gap?

On an unrelated note: the adaptor seems to still have traces from some kind of machining on its inner surface, which would eventually taint the sensor of your camera, if not removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The image  circle of a pro broadcast lens (even those monster lenses you see at football games is only 2/3 of an inch (17mm). That is all the sensor real estate that is needed for very clear ultra high definition video. I shoot HD video with cameras like that almost every week and it goes on giant screen Monitors in the hockey arena as well as out to cable TV.  The slightly speckled surface you see in the adapter picture is just the surface that the lens mount is locked to by a clamping ring. The inside of the mount is flat black. The upside of a small sensor size is that you can get tremendous magnification from a manageable size lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
18 hours ago, Hugues said:

so what lens and adapter would you guys suggest for Sony A7siii ?

Not the type discussed in this thread, that's for sure... Why would you prefer an adapted lens anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see a new camera with a smaller sensor that would be compatible with existing video lenses. Power zoom lenses on pro video cameras are very liberating in therir reach and ability to reframe an image. As a pro video cameraman I would love to have a small and lightweight camera with more reach without the weight of heavy telephoto lenses designed for large format sensors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thank you XKAES  and Pieter for responding to my query. Since my post, I figured out what I was doing wrong, and now I am getting more predictable results. To answer a few questions, I am using a Sony A7R5, and am aware that it is ISO invariant, however at least for what I've tried, there are limits to how much you can "push" exposure in post. I am doing some night/astrophotography and when I set iso to 400, and increase exposure in post, I get more noise in dark foreground areas than if I use a higher iso in camera when I increase exposure 4 stops or more. I wanted to do iso bracketing so that I could further compare the results and choose the settings that gave me the best results. I had hoped that I could set the minimum iso to 320 and take 3 or more images at 2 stop increments, but I now doubt that's possible. Since the camera is choosing iso based on the light it detects, it may or may not start at 320. Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • Thank you @Cameratose. I have tried Shotcut and it seems I can work with the video. I still don't understand why this works and yet iMovie does not. But happy to have a work around and I will keep learning. Thanks for your help. 
    • Out of pure curiosity: why would you want to shoot a bracket using ISO as your means to control exposure? Sony cameras are virtually ISO invariant (save for the second gain step), so raising ISO in camera or in post-production yields nearly identical results. Most people shoot bracketed exposures to gain detail in over- and underexposed areas, but when you use ISO as your exposure variable, you might as well just create the bracket in post by raising/dropping exposure. You don't gain any dynamic range that way.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...