Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'd vote for reformat.

I assume (sic) this to be preferable but I confess ignorance of the evidence base.I do know that on my blackmagic (2.5k) simply deleting clips from the SSD (out of camera) causes (or at least contributes to) chaos and dropped frames.

Reformatting (in camera) also causes chaos if one hasn't transferred the clips but that's another story...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, format in the camera. Formatting starts with a blank slate each time, and that is much more preferable than starting out with a file system where a lot of files have been deleted.

 

I recently spoke with a colleague who told me about when the local police force invested in their first digital cameras (when she worked there). They just deleted pictures off the camera after importing them, and after a while the memory cards started corrupting images and dropping data. They found out that formatting the cards didn't cause this problem, at least not that early on.

 

But, if i recall correctly, you can store camera settings on the SD card (at least on my A7II, it may just be the same for the A6000), so you'll lose those if you reformat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The camera is not keeping track of anything that

goes away when you reformat. The "image database"

belongs to the images on that card, but not to

the camera itself. After all, if you swap cards

during a shoot, no problem arises.

 

Many users keep the file numbering on the default

which is sequential. The camera keeps track of its

number sequence regardless of how many cards you

might swap out. A reformatted card is just another

card as far as the camera's brain is concerned.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sony is using FAT32 file system format. Its very simple, so formatting in-camera or using a PC should not matter - there is no magic or special settings that I'm aware of regarding FAT32 (and I've looked a few times). In terms of future write performance to the SD-Card, there should be no practical difference between deleting all-files or formatting. If however you only delete some files then the File System on the SD-Card will become fragmented over time, and eventually that fragmentation will result in slower write performance.

 

With the Sony A7ii (and probably the A6000 too) formatting will wipe out Memory items M1..M4 which is a little annoying. There might be other settings saved on the SD-Card too? But, as these exist on the SD-Card you can back them up and restore them, which is handy perhaps? Therefore deleting all-files does offer some benefit, and can be a little faster than formatting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...