Jump to content

Fully detailed APCS (active pixel) sensor spec sheet!


SAR_admin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,


 


I think that the new sensor will not benefit in terms of low light performance. Indeed, it can not capture more light per unit of time since it uses the same RGB filter which rejects 2/3 of light.


 


As to the higher resolution, they can make Bayern sensors with crasy resolution (e.g. 20 Mpix 1/2.6''), so there is no need for that. 


 


No need for interpolation - no moire, nice indeed.


 


If they can ensure its durability (fast moving part ot top of the photodiode array).


 


The minimum total exposure time with that model can not be less than (2x1/192 + 3x1/16) = ca. 1/5 ms, or 1/5000 s. Correspondingly about 5000 fps, as far as the bus/processor/recorder allows. And it could be improved in the future.    


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the new sensor will not benefit in terms of low light performance. Indeed, it can not capture more light per unit of time since it uses the same RGB filter which rejects 2/3 of light.

 

I think you are correct when compare the pixel with the same size from APCS sensor and Bayer sensor.  However, base on what I understand, since APCS sensor only need 1 pixel to capture 3 color channels, in theory, it saved the spaces for 3 additional pixels in order to accomplish this on Bayer sensor which allow doubling the pixel size.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are correct when compare the pixel with the same size from APCS sensor and Bayer sensor.  However, base on what I understand, since APCS sensor only need 1 pixel to capture 3 color channels, in theory, it saved the spaces for 3 additional pixels in order to accomplish this on Bayer sensor which allow doubling the pixel size.  

Thinking generally, with given sensor size and the same RGB filter the amount of light consumed with all pixels (or all Bayer subpixels) will be the same. You can only distribute the light in different ways (spatially in Bayer or temporally in APCS).

 

One big APCS pixel is equivalent to three smaller Bayer subpixels. The big pixel is exposed to each color for 1/3 of the total exposure time whereas the smaller (1/3 by area) subpixels are exposed to their colors for full time. The number of formed electrons will be the same. I do not take into account the useless area of gaps which will be smaller for APCS. 

 

If you make an APCS sensor with small pixels, these small pixels will be exposed to each color for 1/3 of the exposure time. This will result in lower SNR. After downsizing to the above pixel count, though, the SNR will become the same as above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'm beginning to think that I have a misconception about the a7R. The one I was wanting had the shutter release button on the hand grip with a resolution of 36mp. It appears the button moved to the handgrip on the a7R II model, which had 42mp resolution.  Sorry for any confusion, I'm in the learning stage yet.  😕 I may need to go with the basic a7, model I or II at 24mp. The 36mp (R) model had the shutter release on the camera body (which I didn't care for).
    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...