Jump to content

Metering issue with a6300 after timelapse


Recommended Posts

Wanted to ask if anyone else has encountered an issue where your a6300 has suddenly developed a problem with metering. In all modes, the camera is now selecting a much higher ISO or much longer exposure to shoot the same scenes that were shooting normally earlier. A normal indoor shot with a 35mm 1.8 lens at 2.0 or 2.2 aperture would be 1/80s long at 100 ISO but now is shooting at 1/10 or 1/5 second exposure. Or if I set the exposure at 1/60 or 1/80 the ISO is shooting up to 3200 or 6400.

 

I know the camera very well as have taken several 10s of thousands of shots with it so noticed the difference immediately. I tried a 50mm and a 16mm lens in addition to the 35mm and see the same behavior.

 

I have reset the camera, removed the battery, etc. but don't see a change.

 

The only significant event before and after the problem started is that I bought and installed the TimeLapse Playmemories app a few days ago. I did one test timelapse overnight for about 7 hours with a USB battery powerbank attached to the camera usb port. When I woke up the internal battery and the powerbank were both exhausted and the camera had shut down. The time lapse was captured and I was able to preview it.

 

One thing to note in the time lapse is that the AEL was set and the morning shots were completely blown out and the camera was probably shooting fully white frames for teh last hour or so.

Not sure if this had anything to do with the problem I am now seeing but nothing else has changed. Could the camera have overheated being on for 7 hours and shooting continuously? Could the app be causing this issue?

 

Please help. Do I need to take the camera in for repair?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also now see that the Steady Shot notifier is now almost always on/blinking. This is because the exposure times are now defaulting to a longer duration and the camera is indicating potential blurring with the shot settings. This was not happening so frequently earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Are the shots still properly exposed? I guess you can check the exposure against another camera, or a light meter/app. They should be in the same ball park at least. If you're using auto modes, cameras will prioritise differently in different modes. Use A or S mode and set ISO manually, to override this programming.

 

Indoor exposures can vary quite a bit, depending on time of day, lighting, metering mode etc, so it's quite impossible to say that indoor shots should always have a certain exposure setting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The shots are exposed properly in Auto mode since the camera is balancing all the settings but the ISO is shooting up to 3200-6400 and even with that the camera is giving the steady shot warning. In A mode with 200 ISO the exposure time is shooting up to over a second.

 

No doubt, the indoor shots can vary quite a bit but in very similar (can't say identical) lighting conditions the camera was very capable at taking 1/80, 100-400iso, 2.0/2.2 shots. Now that doesn't seem to be happening.

 

Is there a way to objectively test the metering results of the camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

Download a light meter app on your smartphone. Match the metering area, which is usually spot meter on your camera. Measure an evenly lit surface, or a grey card if you have it. Measure in A mode with aperure and ISO matching in the camera and app. Note the difference in measured shutter speed. In most cases, the app and the camera should be within a stop of each other, often less. If your camera is way off, as you feel, the app will certainly confirm it.

 

(There are variations in actual sensor sensitivity and lens transmission, so you shouldn't expect the exact same readings from the camera and apo, although it happens.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand what's happening, the camera is 

making perfectly good exposures automatically,  

but the user is unsettled about the the camera's 

"approach" to making those exposures ... all the 

settings it chooses when attaining those results.  

    

So it seems then, that the camera is not in need 

of repair or adjustment. The user and the camera 

kinda need a bit of "couples therapy" to resolve a  

mismatch in their attitudes, but basically they are 

a rather functional working team ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) That would be the easiest way to resolve this!

 

Unfortunately, I still won't be able to take the indoor or low light shots that I was able to take earlier. Either the exposure would be too long or the shots would be too grainy because the ISO would be too high.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 33mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...