Jump to content

sony a6300 noise problem


Recommended Posts

hello,

i have purchase the sony 6300 ,and i shot a footage in low light.

now when i view it on my camera,my iso at 6400,4k,shutter speed at 1/50,aperture at 1.4.and there was no noise,but when i viewed it on my computer, I found so much noise on it.

it is the settings i messed up or something else?

 

thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is normal to have noise in iso 6400. If the scene you are filming is quite dark then it is normal to have a noisy result. Noise is also visible when the signal to noise ratio is low. What I want to say is that when you record a bright scene with iso 3200 the signal will be strong and the noise will be less visible. If you record a scene with iso 3200 and is dark then the noise will be more visible because the signal (light) will be lower. So there are many things that interact for the final rwsult. You can also post process your videoa and use a noise reduction software.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

How does the YouTube videos work then?I bought the a6300 because I saw the video last w light was so good at like iso16000,etc.do they have slog or cine?

I always thought that the a 6300 is a low light camera,was I wrong?

 

Sent from my HTC_M8x using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you are not wrong.

 

Maybe the videos you have seen are post processed with noise reduction. If you have seen a video on YouTube and you like it technically you can try to ask information and advice from the creator.

 

Have in mind that almost always post processing is needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...