Jump to content

Why Even Have A Shutter Mechanism Anyway?


Recommended Posts

Something I never have understood is quite how digital cameras can record video without a shutter opening & closing repeatedly, and, if that is possible (which it obviously is), then why can't the camera just "activate" its sensor for a minute segment of time, (such as 1/60, 1/125, 1/250 etc.) and totally do away with the heavy, complex, vibration-creating shutter mechanism entirely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just dispense with the lenses while were at it ?  :o

 

 

 

Something I never have understood is quite how digital cameras can record video without a shutter opening & closing repeatedly, and, if that is possible (which it obviously is), then why can't the camera just "activate" its sensor for a minute segment of time, (such as 1/60, 1/125, 1/250 etc.) and totally do away with the heavy, complex, vibration-creating shutter mechanism entirely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest PenGun

So... How did you regulate the exposure then?

LOL. It's a trick you do with 2 dark slides. I was aiming for 1/8 sec. I came pretty close.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest PenGun

The shutter part is easy.  Teaching a cat to jump a motorbike over 12 flaming school buses is the hard part. 

 Nah, be too hard to print. ;) That one comes up all sumtuous on my Eppy 3800. There is something about, way too many pixels, for B&W prints.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PenGun, I've got a cat like that, he wants the keys to the truck and the dog to work the pedals while he steers.

 

"then why can't the camera just "activate" its sensor for a minute segment of time, (such as 1/60, 1/125, 1/250 etc.) and totally do away with the heavy, complex, vibration-creating shutter mechanism entirely?"

 

The problem is in the "etc". Video frame rate is slow, so you've got time to process. When exposure gets short, 1/1000 for example, you don't have much time to poll the sensor. It's a straightforward question of how quick you can read and move data. If sensors quit getting denser and we get more processing bandwidth we'll be able to ditch that mechanical shutter. Until then, the electronic first curtain that gets us half way there by turning the sensor on is as good as it gets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest PenGun

PenGun, I've got a cat like that, he wants the keys to the truck and the dog to work the pedals while he steers.

 

 I was very lucky. I was fooling with the camera and this 240mm barrel lens I had acquired in some deal. In LF you make a lot of deals it seems, well I did. Anyway she jumps up on the bike and gives me the 'why are you not paying attention to me' look and the rest was pure serendipity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

`  

   

@SonyGuy,

  

If you wanna buy a Shutterless Sony, and you have a bit over

$2K mad money, get you an A7S. Spoiler alert: It DOES have

a shutter ... but you don't hafta use it. It can operate in a true

silent mode, which involves electronic 1st curtain ... AND 2nd

curtain ... such that the mechanical shutter is not involved at

all. Acoarst this returns us to a version of your original posting:

"Why would an A7S user engage the mechanical shutter ?".

   

Technically, there are reasons, but they're not very compelling

for most users. If I had one I doubt I'd ever engage the shutter.

   

`  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...