Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hello,

i have purchase the sony 6300 ,and i shot a footage in low light.

now when i view it on my camera,my iso at 6400,4k,shutter speed at 1/50,aperture at 1.4.and there was no noise,but when i viewed it on my computer, I found so much noise on it.

it is the settings i messed up or something else?

 

thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is normal to have noise in iso 6400. If the scene you are filming is quite dark then it is normal to have a noisy result. Noise is also visible when the signal to noise ratio is low. What I want to say is that when you record a bright scene with iso 3200 the signal will be strong and the noise will be less visible. If you record a scene with iso 3200 and is dark then the noise will be more visible because the signal (light) will be lower. So there are many things that interact for the final rwsult. You can also post process your videoa and use a noise reduction software.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

How does the YouTube videos work then?I bought the a6300 because I saw the video last w light was so good at like iso16000,etc.do they have slog or cine?

I always thought that the a 6300 is a low light camera,was I wrong?

 

Sent from my HTC_M8x using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you are not wrong.

 

Maybe the videos you have seen are post processed with noise reduction. If you have seen a video on YouTube and you like it technically you can try to ask information and advice from the creator.

 

Have in mind that almost always post processing is needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...