Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have had trouble on exposure with Sony A7SII at cloudless daylight videos and I am looking for proper strength ND filter for the purpose. I take film at 25fps 1/50 with SLog3/S-Gamut3.Cine with ISO1800-3600 at f3.5-7.1(preferably) at +1EV and during daylight testing I found out that I had to stretch the aperture up to 20-22 in order to have somewhat decent exposure.

 

I got a Chinese Fotga variable ND filter for free from a friend but the vignetting is noticeable even at lower stops and at higher end it is useless.

 

It appears to me that I would need something in the range of ND10000 to coop with the excess light.

 

On the other hand, someone suggested switching to Cine.4 from SLog3 at daylight shots to bring down the iso, thus balance the light. Should this adversely affect the video quality?

 

I'm not a pro so pardon me if there if I've tripped in a few pits on my way at this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pekka.  
Wondering why you are using ISO 1800-3600 in daytime?  If you drop from 1800 ISO to 100 ISO that's around 4 stops of light you've allowed for right there.  Could even go to 50 ISO, so 5 stops down already.  Shouldn't need a heavy ND unless you want to shoot wide open (f2.8 - f4) for depth of focus reasons.
And what is the end result you are shooting for?  Mentioning you are "not a pro" makes me think you should stay away from the s-Log settings for the time-being... ( I think min ISO for s-log is 800 ISO?) until you've got a better handle on the camera, and what s-Log is meant for.
Try using one of the rec.709 profiles, PP4 to start with.
Some good comments on this page about video settings on the A7R2... https://www.erwinvandijck.com/nieuws/optimized-video-settings-sony-a7r2

 

PS...  ALWAYS have your exposure graph visible when shooting video... then you'll know if you are in the ballpark making the most of your sensor or not.

 

good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I switched to Cine1 + S-Gamut3.Cine for ISO100 and it appears that with my adjustable filter I get good results at f.7.1 with 7 stops added with variable filter. I consider f3.5 - f7.1 a good range of aperture for my needs(I've got the 2870 kit lens btw). I actually abandoned the S-Log for now because it appears that Cine1 and Cine4 will do better job for me.

 

I also got the ND1000 but there appears to be a significant amount of degradation of detail and vignetting and hence it does not work for video.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi !

 

For me ND16-ND64 filters works well, however I don't use S-log much, mostly Cine profiles, while S-log2/3 mostly for situations with high contrast, like filming with direct sun, night scenes etc. 

Btw ND64 is reducing light by 6 full stops which equivalent going from f22 to f2.8

 

Best Regards,

Andrey

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I stopped using ND filters and now shoot at higher shutter speed. I have never found a problem doing this despite what some purists say. Put the camera (without ND filter) in full auto mode and see what it does. Settings close to what the camera does adjusted for DOF gives me excellent results. Sometimes we make things more complicated than they are. This camera is great in auto mode; try shooting in aperture priority - it's easy - and in most non studio environments will give perfect results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Will give that a try, was thinking of doing something similar only trying a series of shots with it on and a series of shots with it off to compare. On my Nikons the VR in the lens is very noticable, was expecting something similar.
    • The vibration is the sensor. Since the A6100 does not have IBIS, you won't feel it. If you're seeing any stabilization improvement at all, it's the lens.  Zoom the lens all the way to 105mm and take a shot at 1/200 shutter to use as a control. Now slow your shutter down a stop at a time, starting around 1/100, then 1/50, then 1/25, etc. and see where the image is no longer sharp. That will tell you how about how many stops of stabilization you're getting with the lens at 105mm. 
    • So what would be your reason to wait for 'reliable reviews'? We already know where it's going to fall just by its very nature.  I'm currently not planning to preorder anyway, although I keep waffling back and forth. My practical side says summer is almost over and I won't use it much in winter, so wait until Spring and maybe it will go on sale. My GAS side, however, is far less pragmatic and wants to get one upon release. I checked with my local store who is a certified Sigma dealer, and they said they will carry them but they may not have them on the 25th. Of course, the other factor is availability. It seems almost every single release these days is followed within a week or two with a statement saying that the manufacturer has 'underestimated demand' and deliveries will be delayed. That's nonsense, of course. The reality is they don't want to build 10,000 of them and be left with 8,000 on a warehouse shelf. They've all engaged in this practice, including Sony, Nikon, Canon, and half a dozen of the Chinese companies.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...