Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I am going to get the a6300 soon and have a burning question:

 

Which lens should I pair it with?

 

I know that with Canon lenses, i will lose native functions such as Eye-AF. However, that is not my utmost concern.

 

Will I get equivalent image quality to the Sony GM if I use the Canon 17-55 or 24-70ii? 

 

I currently have the 24-70ii but planning to sell it, since it's probably a waste that the APS-C sensor can't take full advantage of my sharp lens. Also, the 17-55 is smaller, has OIS and is way cheaper. I just want to know if I'll lose significant image quality by doing so. 

 

My work comprises:

 

70% in 4k24p

10% in 1080/120

20& in stills

 

Meanwhile, I'm also eagerly waiting for reviews of the Sigma adapter. If eye-AF can work accurately and reliably using the 18-35 1.8 or 35/1.4 ART with a6300, then I'm sold.

 

Suggestions welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it happens, I have a Canon 17-55 from my Canon 50D days.

I have played around with it on my A6000, and if we ignore the not so impressive autofocus speed (hopefully fixed when using the A6300) it´s an odd lens choice for sure.

The lens is in my opinion way too big and heavy for actual use as a generic zoom lens on the camera. It completely defies the point of getting a smaller camera in the first place.

 

Image quality seems fine, although not tested extensively due to the size. :)

 

I loved it on my 50D but now it stays at home.Although not as wide or bright, I´ll likely grab my FE 28-70mm instead.

 

 

 

/Allan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...