Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone! I'm a relatively new user to the Sony A7IV, have had it for about 6 months now but do not have any experience with video. I'll be traveling on an international vacation to Croatia in September and want to take full advantage of this camera for video. However, after watching a handful of guides about proper settings, a lot of these tutorials are geared towards users who have video experience and have the capability of color grading and what not. Many videos suggested recording in SLOG3 and to "overexpose" since it would be graded in post. However, I don't know if I'll be going this far with my videos. If anything, I'll do some light editing and then post on social media. Should I still record in a setting as if I were going to professionally edit these videos? Or should I ?record in a setting that will be easier to deal with once I get it on the computer? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am making videos for 23 years, since 1 year with the A7IV. I would leave the pro features for the pros, they only make sense if you have a professional video software and you are willing to spend a lot of time with it - for only relative small improvements (my opinion).

I would select XAVC HS 4K with 60p and 75M 4:2:0 10bit which will give excellent quality. You will have a crop of factor 1.5 with this, meaning a 50mm lens will look like 75mm. If you don't want to have this crop I would recommend XAVC S 4K 30p 100M 4:2:0 8bit.

Anything with 4:2:2 is difficult to play on a computer or on a TV and also difficult to cut with a software (needs a lot of PC power), so I would not recommend it in your case. Just like using the profiles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Snofru said:

I am making videos for 23 years, since 1 year with the A7IV. I would leave the pro features for the pros, they only make sense if you have a professional video software and you are willing to spend a lot of time with it - for only relative small improvements (my opinion).

I would select XAVC HS 4K with 60p and 75M 4:2:0 10bit which will give excellent quality. You will have a crop of factor 1.5 with this, meaning a 50mm lens will look like 75mm. If you don't want to have this crop I would recommend XAVC S 4K 30p 100M 4:2:0 8bit.

Anything with 4:2:2 is difficult to play on a computer or on a TV and also difficult to cut with a software (needs a lot of PC power), so I would not recommend it in your case. Just like using the profiles.

Thank you so much for the input and settings recommendations. If anyone else can chime in, I would love some additional information. My computer is relatively new but don't think it has the capability of performing heavy load video editing and I don't necessarily have the time or money to invest in video specific equipment and editing.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...