Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I got my A7II two days ago and ran some tests.  On high speed continuous it was virtually impossible to shoot just one frame, no matter how quickly I took my finger off the shutter button.  I would almost always get at least two frames.  Also the shutter seemed to depress quite a bit before triggering - at least much more than my A7.  It will make me crazy trying to get only one frame when in high speed which is where I want to be most of the time covering news (I am a Reuters photographer)  so I sent it back to B&H for an exchange.  We'll see if the new one works the same way.  Of course its out of stock again so no idea when I will have it.  Anyone else notice this with their MII's?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I got my A7II two days ago and ran some tests.  On high speed continuous it was virtually impossible to shoot just one frame, no matter how quickly I took my finger off the shutter button.  I would almost always get at least two frames.  Also the shutter seemed to depress quite a bit before triggering - at least much more than my A7.  It will make me crazy trying to get only one frame when in high speed which is where I want to be most of the time covering news (I am a Reuters photographer)  so I sent it back to B&H for an exchange.  We'll see if the new one works the same way.  Of course its out of stock again so no idea when I will have it.  Anyone else notice this with their MII's?

You are not quick with that button finger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a horrible "bug" :P

Why do you mind taking two or *even* three frames every time? If you are a Reuters photographer :o

The problem with that is in the edit - on a several hour long assignment I will have to look at many duplicate frames which is a waste of time and slows down getting the pictures to the wire.  I ask again, any owners have a similar experience?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty quick, but useable on my A7ii. It feels/sounds a little different, but about the same repeat rate as my A65. I don't have an A7, but have read in a couple of reviews that the shutter release on the A7ii is one of the changes. I believe it is a longer throw and more staging between half press and release. It may be that a little getting used to the different shutter release will resolve the issue for you. FWIW, just sitting here fiddling with high speed continuous for the first time on the A7ii I'm getting doubles once every 3 - 4 times, marginally more than on the A65. Believe the frame rate on the A7ii is 5fps. So far I'm tickled with mine. Compact, handles well and very pretty IQ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I got my A7II two days ago and ran some tests. On high speed continuous it was virtually impossible to shoot just one frame, no matter how quickly I took my finger off the shutter button.

I see the same behaviour on the A6000. With AF-C I never could shoot just one single foto. Also not with medium picture rate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have similar issues with my 1Dx. I cannot imagine that is that uncommon and I dismissed it as being caused by a very responsive camera since in that form of continuous shooting more complaints would be that it is not shooting fast enough. Can you decrease the fps on that camera to maybe 3 ot 4 fps. That may help. I do not have that problem with my 99 but then I think it is fairly unresponsive, slow and poor processing speed, but takes awesome images.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I don't think any camera guide mentions it, most manufacturers remain mute. It is discussed regularly and typically pointed out during new camera reviews. If Sony were trying to keep it a secret, they wouldn't let their shills say anything. There's no chance of keeping anything like this quiet these days, someone is going to spill the beans. I suspect they, like other manufacturers, don't discuss it in print for some technical reason. I have discussed it with Sony reps at local camera events on several occasions, it's no secret. In fact, they like to tell you about the advantages in practical application.  One thing I noticed in the chart above. The DR chart shows a smaller gain at ISO 400 than the read noise chart. This one is more accurate for noise, and you can see that ISO 400 is actually similar to ISO 126. That's a huge advantage. If you check this chart for your A7 RV you'll see that ISO 320 gets you down to between 126 and 159, seems plenty usable to me. 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      And a different look. The shadow improvement charts show where the shadows are improved for DR, and how much. In the A7 IV there's about a 2-1/2 stop improvement at ISO 400, and then no additional improvement at all until you get to ISO 56K, where Sony applies in-camera NR. According to the primer on this chart, there is no degradation of noise along these flat lines, like from 400 to 51K. Not sure I can agree with that, but I can certainly recover image into ISO 50K in testing and shoot ISO 16-20K successfully.         
    • It is 320 for stills on my A7R5 so it’s 5/3 stops. I have used it on occasions but it’s a bit low to be any huge deal. It is much more use in video where it is 2500. Have a search for any of those terms you mentioned above in any current Sony camera online guide & I doubt you will find anything. I was at an event yesterday where there were two Sony reps & they wouldn’t discuss it even though one of the presenters mentioned it when talking about his A7S3.
    • Yes, I would always wait a week before installing just to see if anyone has problems. This is good advice for any software updates to be honest.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...