Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have recently purchased an a7R and a 24-70mm FE Lens, and have been wanting to take some photos using the auto-bracketing feature to make HDR images. 

 

My issue is that holding down the shutter while all the images are taken is known to cause camera shake. I have been looking around various websites but there's nothing too clear about it. 

 

I have seen there is a Sony RMTDSLR2 Wireless Remote available, but I am uncertain of whether this will do what I am looking for, and if it does, I have seen elsewhere that you have to point it right in front of the camera (not from behind it) to take photos. 

 

There is also an iOS app with added hardware called Triggertrap but that looks quite complicated and again I don't know if that will do what I'm looking for.

 

Just looking for a simple way to take HDR photos on the a7R without the camera shaking while I hold down the shutter button. 

 

Thank you

 

Stephen 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

My issue is that holding down the shutter while all the images are taken is known to cause camera shake. I have been looking around various websites but there's nothing too clear about it. 

 

 

There is also an iOS app with added hardware called Triggertrap but that looks quite complicated and again I don't know if that will do what I'm looking for.

 

Just looking for a simple way to take HDR photos on the a7R without the camera shaking while I hold down the shutter button. 

 

Thank you

 

Stephen 

This seems backwards to me ... this phrase especially:

 

"holding down the shutter while all the images are taken is known to cause camera shake."

 

Cuz hi speed continuous shooting is a good way to assure sharp images, but only

the frames after the 1st frame cuz it can suffer from pushing the button down.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The problem of camera shake with SONY A mount becomes more serious,  when using the long telephoto lenses. This issue gets further amplified when doing continuous shooting of moving subjects like in wildlife (esp. Birds in flight) and sports. I realized this when I tested the Sony A mount in  continuous shooting of birds in flight.

 

I  found that in most occasions,  from 3rd image onwards, the series of images coming out of the camera is not sharp.  This point was highlighted in one of the internet articles by a pro photographer, who said that his/her rate of "in focus shots" to "total shots taken" of a sport event was 50% with a  Sony, whilst Nikon and Canon gave around 90%. 

 

Sony and Nikon uses the same processor but Nikon's keep on producing series of sharp images from much worse AF systems than what we get from Sony. When you get a sharp image with a Sony-believe me it is sharper than any other, but, generally on a percentage, Nikon and Canon, wins the race.

 

I believe the problem lies when the camera sensor has to do too many things with Sony and it fails. I believe that this is the reason why even SONY's "LOCK ON AF CONTINUOUS" fails when it comes to tracking animals  who are (Like a Bird) moving unpredictably. 

 

My belief is that to start off, the camera sensor need a steady image to do a sharp focus on it by use of its processor. SONY needs a system of "in body stabilization" which has to work first and stabilize the image and then use its superior AF system for focus on the subject. I believe that if Sony engineers can figure a method to do this, then world of Photography will say bye to Canon and Nikon, at least when it comes to photography of Sports and Wild life. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lower hit ratio, but still successful, at 50%. And you say

that Sony's 50% is sharper than Nikon's 90%, and you

suspect the processor of being overworked. Processor

issue or not, sounds like quality instead of quantity, the

deal I prefer and perhaps Sony also prefers, or caters to

those users with that preference. IOW, maybe it's not an

overworked processor, just a different algoriddm. There's

no competition, no winners/losers, in that scenario, just

a difference, a matter of choice. With no competition it

follows that the issue will not be pursued in the manner

you suggest, but will simply gradually yield to the usual

inexorable pursuit of improvements of the "because we

can - and we can convince users they need it"[u/] variety.

 

Proof ? or at least a supporting argument ? Well, nobody

really needed stabilization or tracking before it became

available, and the earliest versions were sold as state

of the art to users who'd become convinced of a need for

these technologies which were far more crudely primitive

than the technology about which you are currently griping.

 

Tracking will NEVER track anything truly unpredictable, as

tracking IS predicting. The success of AF tracking depends

on the robofocus noticing and analyzing predictable small

patterns of behavior. It used to be the user's job to do that,

but users depended upon more information, and "larger"

information, than the AF tracking can access. The camera

brain only knows what it sees, and deals with information

of a "smaller" more detailed type. It knows nothing of the

rules and strategies of sports, or the behavior of wildlife,

which is the "larger" information that the user is expected

to provide.

 

Acoarst none of the above addresses the HDR situation. For

reducing shake while bracketing for HDR raise the ISO. The

HDR process greatly reduces noise, similar to the multiframe

noise reduction feature built into some Sony cameras. If the

working contexts allows, use ISO bracketing so that not all

your collected exposures are subject to a noise increase.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thinking about control of images in low light with blur and movement I would like to experiment more with me manually varying aperture during a shot. With a manual lens this allows me to start with a small aperture and collect some fluidity and then snap lens to much larger aperture to give a more solid defined image. To date in a few quick trials I have just used a fixed exposure time judged by seeing exposure at a few apertures and then just trying my dexterity. A next step up would be that the camera closes the shutter when it has accumulated enough light. Maybe some long exposure /astronomy contexts might do that sort of thing....? To help imagine I'm thinking musicians in a bar, animals in low light, individuals in motion in some context. Mostly I seem to need near 1s exposure to synch my aperture change and have enough time. A de-clicked lens or one with a loose aperture ring would help (maybe I have at home on the shelf) but I am away with just 2 old Olympus lenses and TBH the aperture rings are a bit stiff and close to the focus ring... Any thoughts or suggestions?
    • Friends don't let friends use Luminar. They lie, their DAM is either non-existent or garbage. They tell you it's a one-time purchase with free updates for the life of the program. Problem is, they bring out a whole new program every year or two, then they stop 'updating' or even supporting the old one. They give away the last version free to suck you in to the next one. I tried them a while back and went through the entire process. When I removed it from my computer (after I cancelled my sale on the new version) I had to delete 36,000 sidecar/thumbnails of my photos, most of which I had never even opened in Luminar. It just went into my folders and automatically created all of these files.  There are many decent programs out there you can get that will stand head and shoulders above Luminar.  
    • I am considering purchasing the Luminar editing program for IOS to use with my A7iv; however in listing which cameras are compatible, there is this statement: "Sony vcb cropped p send-raw format is not currently supported."  Does anyone know if this means that the program will not work with raw photos?  Has anyone successfully used this program editing raw photos? 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...