Jump to content

Loch Fyne, West Coast


JGrange7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Finally got out to use my new Sony A6000. I ventured over to the west coast of Scotland to find some nice scenery and was blown away. I was able to use my camera properly. This was the first image I got that I was properly happy with, with some basic editing on LR.

If anyone has any constructive criticism, please feel free. But be gentle.398bfc720eb7114c804132b97a69f9f8.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

I love Scotland, all of it, but especially the north-western parts. The main thing to mention about the photo is that you could do some more work on the colour balance. Sunsets tend to throw the in-camera colour metering off, which means you have to fix it manually in LR. There's nothing wrong with having some subjective colour in a shot, if it looks nicer. In this case, there is a purple hue that does not occur naturally, so that could be a thing to fix.

 

Here are a couple of pointers, start with an unedited copy of your image (Reset):

 

1. Camera Calibration (bottom right), choose Profile: Camera Neutral

2. Basic (top right): WB: Toggle between As Shot, Auto, Daylight, Cloudy and Shade. Chose the white balance profile that gives you the most natural look 

3. Basic: Make fine adjustments on the Temp and Tint sliders until it has the overall colour balance you want.

4. Basic: Presence: Increase the Vibrance slider slightly to boost the undersaturated colours. 

 

This is one basic way of fixing colours. The idea is that you start with an image that looks washed-out but has a preserved colour tonality. Then you gradually work your way up to a more vibrant picture. Colour is a bit like sugar, if you use too much of it you become addicted and just pile it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...