Jump to content

Sony 28 - 135mm f/4 SZ vs Sigma 24 - 105 mm f/4 Art lens


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Trying to think of a good lens to use as the work horse on a A7S ii and so far I'm thinking of the Sony 28 - 135mm f/4 lens or the Sigma 24 - 105mm f/4 Art lens. While the Sony is a lot more expensive then the Sigma (around £1400 more) I'm wondering is it worth paying £1400 more?

 

My main use will be video but I will also want to take stills, which I'm guessing the Sony may be too bulky to be used hand held for long durations, but the Sony would look more professional when shooting for clients.

 

As anyone used both and could give me their opinions on them?

 

Thanks

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I own the Sony 28-135 PZ. Here are some of its advantages over the Sigma 24-105:

 

- Servo zoom

- Parfocal

- Internal focusing

- Declickable aperture

 

Both are very sharp. The Sigma has an advantage on the wide end, the Sony has an advantage on the long end.

 

If you can afford it, the Sony is almost always going to be the better choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...