Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

A quick introduction as I've just joined the forum.

 

Been a keen amateur for many years now and migrated to digital via a Fuji bridge camera and Canon EOS 1100D. I now have an Alpha 7 which was a present last week from my wife and daughters for my 60th. A whole new world and I'll be looking for advice as I find my way around this new camera.

 

Thanks for looking

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tim

 

I'm certainly planning to have great fun with this - just wish the print in the guide was a bit bigger!

 

The kit lens is a 28 - 70 OSS.

 

Apparently a big advantage is the ability to use older high quality film camera lenses via adapters. May look into that in the new year. Or maybe just look at 'native' fit lenses?

 

Cheers

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can get an adapter to fit a wide range of lenses. Many would disagree with this but i'd only buy adapters from 1. Novoflex and 2. Metabones. Thery cost more, certainly, but (in my opinion and without any scientific evidence!) you get what you pay for. I use Leica M lenses (Voigtlander/Zeiss) and Nikon - manual focus - in addition to Samyang (my interest is almost exclusively video) and a couple of the Sony offerings. Have a look at ebay and you can pick up Minolta and Contax-Yashica glass very reasonably. Or, of course, have a look at the Samyang range as they offer reasonably high quality at a very attractive price (the quality of the lens is possibly less important for video than stills however). Ask elsewhere as I have no experience but there are also adapters for Canon AF if that's preferable. You'll find a lot of posts here along the lines of "I want N lenses - what should I buy?" All a bit pointless in my opinion - better to state what you want to do (I want to take pictures of sunsets/birds in flight/grandchildren playing) and someone with that experience will offer advice. Again, only a personal opinion, but I get the impression that a lot of people want to get away from the "stigma" of a kit lens asap... Why? Its a decent enough lens - at least until you're certain what you want! Who knows what might be in the Christmas box!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...