Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Wonder if the post topic fits the forum topic.  Whatever...

Anyone knows how to test any lenses  without buying ?I'd like to try different focal lengths before choosing one.

I've got a sony a7 i body, EF frame 

Thank you 

🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alforno said:

Hello Cameratose,

I actually live in Belgium. Here, there are also rental possibilities. But they are expensive. I don't think they are worth it.

I dislike renting as well, but if you don't have any friends you can borrow from and no local stores you don't have much choice. I guess whether it's worth it all depends on how much money you're risking if you don't like the lens.

One thing you can do is read/watch reviews and above all, look at sample photos from the average person. Those are more valuable to me than any review. Many forums have active photo pages with forums dedicated to specific lenses. 

Also, check resellers like MPB, who offer a liberal return policy and a 180-day warranty on their gear. I have used them successfully many times. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2025 at 2:13 AM, Alforno said:

Hello,

Wonder if the post topic fits the forum topic.  Whatever...

Anyone knows how to test any lenses  without buying ?I'd like to try different focal lengths before choosing one.

I've got a sony a7 i body, EF frame 

Thank you 

🙂

Is your camera the original A7? There is a known issue with that body, in that the mount isn't metal (there are disagreements over whether it is plastic or some other material). Just be aware that you may see issues sooner or later with it.

Also, the mount is sometimes referred to as "FE" because it's a full-frame E mount. It's never called EF - that's the old Canon EOS DSLR mount. So be careful not to buy an EF mount lens - you can use EF mount lenses on a Sony E mount camera, but you required an adapter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, FunWithCameras said:

Is your camera the original A7? There is a known issue with that body, in that the mount isn't metal (there are disagreements over whether it is plastic or some other material). Just be aware that you may see issues sooner or later with it.

Also, the mount is sometimes referred to as "FE" because it's a full-frame E mount. It's never called EF - that's the old Canon EOS DSLR mount. So be careful not to buy an EF mount lens - you can use EF mount lenses on a Sony E mount camera, but you required an adapter.

Yes, it's a sony a7 mark i 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...