Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would like a little feedback on this please. I am shooting with the Sony A7RV body, currently have the 16-35, 24-70, 100-400 Sony lenses. Just ordered the 70-200 2.8 GM2 to replace the 100-400 because I rarely use 200-400 range, only if I need to see something in the distance, rarely for a useable image. I shoot mostly landscapes, mountain imagery. I can always get an extender if I need to go beyond 200 on the 70-200. So the next thing I am considering is selling the 24-70 2.8 GM original or version 1. I was thinking of getting either the 50 or 55mm prime instead and having a much sharper lens vs the 24-70. I usually shoot the 24-70 at 40-70 range. Has anyone done this with any of the 61 mp bodies and felt no need for the 24-70 in favor of a 50? My thought is 70 is covered with the 70-200, 24-35 is covered with the 16-35, so why not? What do you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a landscape photographer you'll have plenty of time to swap lenses so kinda makes sense. The 61Mp sensor also allows for some cropping if you can't get the framing right with a prime. For any other purpose I wouldn't want to miss a general purpose zoom in the 24-70 range.

If by 55mm you mean the Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm f/1.8, it's been much acclaimed in the past but do bear in mind those reviews are 10 years old. By today standards it's mediocre at best and it's even being outperformed by the new generation of zoom lenses. One thing I personally hate about this lens is the dreadful amount of LoCa. If your budget allows I'd much rather get the new 50mm f/1.4 GM. Even the Sigma 50mm f/2 is a much better (and cheaper) option.

Edited by Pieter
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Yes, sorry I didn't explain myself well. I've shown a picture of a cover, but maybe a cover does not protect the camera enough. I've seen neoprene covers in Amazon, but I'm looking for something else.  I need something with a zip so the camera is dust protected, with pads so it's shock protected, cool retro looking (like leather or hard canvas) and smaller than what I've found. With just the size to hold my camera with the lens.    Maybe I explained better now ;)
    • You ask about bags, but then post pictures and discuss camera covers. Which do you want? If all you're doing is carrying a camera and one lens, maybe a cover.  If you check out amazon you can find camera covers, usually in neoprene, but some in leather. That's also a good source to see different bags. When I'm shooting an auto show or cruise, I typically carry a camera/lens in a neoprene cover and a pouch with two spare batteries. 
    • I recently came back to street photography after 20 years. In my 20s I used to carry my film camera around everywhere I went, I carried it on my shoulder with just the typical leather case that came with the camera (in the picture attached).  I just got my need for street photography back and so I bought a A7CII with the 40mm 2.5  I'm looking for a small shoulder bag to carry it around but everything I found is too big. I got this camera and lens for its size and I want to keep it small. Maybe I won't find a leather case like the one on my film Yashica, but something similar in size, just to carry the camera with that lens and nothing else... And if it is a retro looking bag, it would be perfect. Maybe leather (or synthetic leather) or a canvas one. The closest I've got is the Think Tank Retrospective 4, but it's still too big, I don't want to carry any extra lens.   Thanks for the help! 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...