Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Long time photographer (late of Nikon and Fuji), first time Sony user 🙂 I went out yesterday with my new A7RV and 16-35 GM II/24-70 GM II to a local cars & coffee event locally for the first field use of the Sony. These were shot RAW but with fairly heavy processing in LrC, DXO PureRAW and Nik ColorFX. The lighting was pretty brutal and the backgrounds largely crap due to location and how close the cars were parked.

I was amazed at how the Sony files stood up to the processing compared my previous cameras. I'm also blown away by DXO PureRAW 4 in terms of both noise obliteration and sharpening/detail improvement with no apparent adverse effects. I was a Capture One user with my Fuji files but I prefer the current Lightroom conversion.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work! I'm a car guy too!

Looks like you shot all of these at ISO 100/200. Don't be afraid to push the envelope with your Sony, I shoot 12800, 16000, and 20000 more than I like due to the venue I spend most of my time in, they turn out great! I too use DXO, but just Deep Prime for NR. I don't even bother denoising for anything below ISO 3200 unless something weird happened and I need to lift a lot. Processing is with Darktable.

Keep in mind too your camera has a dual-gain amplifier. ISO 320 is slightly better noise-wise than ISO 160. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...