I would be interested in other users thought on the question of shooting compressed vs. uncompressed RAW files with the A7rII.
I have been shooting uncompressed thus far. I make large exhibition prints. Occasionally for a less important assignment or one with a smaller final output I shoot compressed RAW.
I googled this topic when I first got the camera and found a an extreme pixel peeper who had done tests and claimed that, when shooting compressed RAW files, he could see small artifacts in areas where dark and light areas met.
Anybody done real world comparisons, making prints etc.?
I am traveling in Asia and had to buy a second external drive to accommodate my 85 MB uncompressed RAW files. It sure would be nice to cut my storage needs in half by shooting compressed RAW files, if there were no discernible loss of image quality.