Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, I’m having an issue with the A9III when paired with the Sony 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM lens. In AF-S mode, everything works as it should. However, in AF-C mode during a football match, I experienced a problem.

When I try to shift focus from one subject, like a player, to something further away like the stands—so making a significant change in focusing distance—it can take up to a second to refocus. I press the shutter halfway and sometimes have to wait almost a full second.

When the subjects are relatively close to each other in distance, there's no major issue. But when I need to quickly refocus on someone much closer, the camera seems to pause for about a second before starting to focus. I disabled Pre-Capture, and it doesn’t make a difference whether AF tracking is on or off—it behaves the same. I also disabled subject recognition (people), changed the AF speed settings, but nothing helps. This behavior only occurs in AF-C mode with this lens. It doesn’t happen all the time, but in most cases it does.

Now, perhaps the most important part: I noticed that if I just only tap very fast the focus button, the lens/camera focuses instantly. But if I press and hold it (to track or maintain focus on a subject), it takes significantly longer. In AF-S mode, it also works perfectly.

With other lenses, like the 70-200 GM2, everything works great. On the A7RIII, this 100-400mm lens also works without issues. Both the camera and lens firmware are up to date.

It is like camera freeze for a second and after that it focus.

I tested on 6 my other lenses and everything is ok. 

Summary:

  • The problem occurs only in AF-C mode.
  • AF-S mode works flawlessly.
  • The issue mainly appears when making large focus distance changes (e.g., from the stands to a player).
  • A quick AF button press results in instant focus, but holding it causes noticeable delay.
  • Other lenses (e.g., 70-200 GM2) work perfectly on the A9 III.
  • The 100-400 GM performs without issues on the A7RIII.
  • All firmware is up to date.
  • Disabling Pre-Capture, face detection, and other settings does not resolve the issue.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
    • If you're only publishing small-sized photo's or viewing on a phone / computer screen, 12-ish MP should be more than enough for your needs. Since with JPEG, the ability to 'fix' stuff on the computer is very limited anyway, you're not giving up much except the ability to crop/recompose after taking the shot. If you tend to crop often or might print large, shoot fine quality instead as JPEGs don't take up a lot of space anyway. I tend to shoot RAW+JPEG. After a trip/shoot, I download my photos to my computer and quickly scan through my JPEGs to select my keepers. The JPEGs are fine for 90% of my needs but at times there are one or two 'WOW'-shots that I might one day print large. I'll edit the RAW of these photos to my hearts content, generate a JPEG, then delete all RAWs to clear up space.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...