Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all - I am a new owner to this a6400, and ill likely have a bunch of stupid questions..

I have 2 mic's : one is a small cheap one that I can't remember where I got it. This cheap mic works fine.

I have a very expensive mic [for voice and music recording] that has an XLR plug. I have adapter cables for the 3.5 in the sony. 

I thought what a better mic to use for audio. 

So here's the problem - When I plug this pro mic in, in pause and record/set/volume, then record, the display shows the audio levels moving. When I make noise or talk the levels move as if I had the cheap mic plugged in. When I "PLAY" the just recorded video, there is no audio... nothing.

Am I missing some setting? why does one mic work and the other not? Why does the pro mic show it is recording audio, test like it is working perfectly, but the video has no sound?

 

Thanks for your assistance.  regards, dw

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The a7iv with the laea 5 is pretty hard to beat. It’ll run all your legacy glass as well as the SLTs with more resolution and better light handling. The more expensive stacked sensor bodies work well with some and not so much with others. Continuous autofocus works but isn’t nearly as dramatic. Unless the a7v comes out with even more advanced stuffs and a non stacked sensor for not a lot more money. And of course you can always add e mount glass as you go, but in my opinion it’s rarely worth the price unless you need the tech specifically. Sigma has some nice options and the 200-600 is nice for sports and wildlife. And the small mortgage 400 & 600. 600 Mino is basically manual focus. It will auto but so slow with the heavy glass it’s not worth the strain on the battery and adapter.  The a68 will keep up with the newer crop sensor bodies well enough that I wouldn’t consider those. 7/8ths autofocus speed, just as bad in low light and similar IQ. Same with the a7iii and older full frame. You’ll game a little but not much for the cost. Should we get the rumored 7r vi that can hang with a Hasselblad or Fuji and retain all the bells and whistles though… 
    • I still shoot several A-Mount lenses including the 500/8 AF Reflex (a real hoot! A 500 Reflex in AF?!!), the 28-135, the 85/1.4, the 35-105, and the lowly 100-200 (or whatever it was). I use them with the LA-EA5 on my A1 and A7 IV.  Up until a year ago I also had the 70-210 'Beercan', 100-400 APO, 80-200/2.8 APO HS G (yes, the 'G' designation came from Minolta) and probably a couple others I'm forgetting.  Just use caution if you go this route. Not all of Sony's cameras work the same with all of their adapters, and the adapters are different. Anything older than the A1 and A7 IV need the LA-EA4, which defeats the purpose of going mirrorless. Heck, I still have a Minolta Maxxum 7000 and a Minolta Maxxum 5D, their last digital camera. Might've been their last camera.  
    • I have been considering going to a mirrorless camera. The reason I went with the a68 is I had all Minolta lenses from my old SLR I had. I don't know of any other camera that would accept these so I may have to bite the bullet and start with all new gear. Any suggestions?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...