Jump to content

Recommendation needed for post production program


Recommended Posts

I   assumed this has caused endless discussion but could not find on this site.

I'm a beginner w/ A6000 and only shooting jpeg but want to start capture Raw and start learning about post production.  What program would you recommend based on ease-of-use and performance/output?  My only experience is editing photos on PhotoShop.  I'm sure there are lots of options, so to help guide, I'd be willing to trade-off performance for ease-of use.  So, if there's a program that rates a 10/10 for performance but difficulty is also a 10 and another that is a 7/10 performance and 7 for difficulty, I'd rather have the latter.  Of course, I'd like the 10 performance, 1 difficulty option, but I'm assuming that may not exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First Lr it is fast and easy to learn/has camera profiles now and all other programs follow its path and has the most lens correction. And the major programs have Plugins so you can go from Lr to them and back.

That being said Capture One is best price if you have a Sony $50 and every new version best of the best for the least BUT wants to control your whole library of photos (there is a way to just do single images at a time). PlayMemories Home to import from SD cards and see what you got where and choose a photo to work, do not import all your photos into Lr  (no need for a bloated other directory) just one at a time play and delete after exporting to a computer directory (you are not going to re edit anyway). So Luminar 2018 and Aurora HDR 2019 (both under $100) for dust spots and object removal in Aurora you link to Luminar edit and go back to Aurora. The reason I mention these is 1. you get more MP's in final tiff and jpeg than Lr (how, I do not know) 2. you process an image or images only no library to mess with and do things you would do in PS!!!! ON1 Photo Raw 2018/2019 single/HDR no library to mess with and so many things that you would do in PS without a monthly cost.  DxO PhotoLab 2018 but also get DxO ViewPoint to correct lines in a photo (Capture One has this) all the same as above. Example of lens correction is Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 if shooting at the sea it will have some rolling only Lr has the fix also if you use the Rokinon 12mm f/2.8 fisheye  no one else has the fix. There are new lenses everyday and only Lr keeps up first. But like Luminar has a Sunburst where a dull sunless day turns bright and sunny. Noise correction all have different ways some better for your shot. ON 1 has a resize (better than Lr) function that will take a 12MP and cropped image and you can get a 50MP for that large frame you want. I like to do Milky Ways and have found more stars when processed with Capture One without looking like noise But will import a tiff to other programs to get better noise control....

Oh last but not least DxO has the old Nik Collection that cost $500 a module at first then Google bought it and offered all 7 for $150 then free but stopped support but now for all $69 well, well worth it good at everything so many things copied in other programs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Posts

    • Hi, Last year I switched from Nikon to Sony (A7Cm2) and this situation surprised me in an unpleasant way. When I travel, I record rather short 8-30 seconds clips, a lot of such clips. And found that these files are rather big because of rounded up to the nearest ~32MB. Different SD cards (64GB) fill up very quickly because of that behavior. Sample sizes for different durations of those clips, for example I have 700 clips with these "distinctive" sizes +/-, nothing in between 33,592,255 67,149,921 100,706,705 134,367,160 167,821,451 201,378,823 234,936,491 268,594,590 302,050,059 335,709,042 ... and so on +/-1000 for the smaller files up to +/-100,000 for the bigger ones rounded up to the nearest ~32MB  Different 64GB cards were formatted inside the camera with exFAT (allocation unit size is 128KB) Why is that? Is there some setting for that?  -- Piotr
    • In short: AF micro adjustment isn't needed in mirrorless cameras, so the option is irrelevant. In DSLRs, the focus module is in a different light path than the photosensitive plane. Minuscule differences in the lengths of these paths can be compensated for with AF Micro adjustment. In mirrorless cameras, the photosensitive plane also contains the focus points. So whenever the camera detects proper focus acquisition, the focus is also exactly on the photosensitive plane. That is, until you use an LA-EA4 adapter to mount your 500mm f/4 onto your A1, which uses its own AF module instead of the cameras AF system. I would strongly advise against going this route: you'll have a state of the art camera with an insanely good AF system, and then you dismiss it 'in favour of' a very dated and compromised AF mechanism. Better try the LA-EA5 if you really want to keep using your old lens.   Edit: apparently autofocus doesn't even work with the LA-EA4 on the A1. https://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/www/cscs/accessories/compatibility.php?area=gb&lang=en&mdl=ILCE-1&cat=7
    • Hi Everyone !! I intend to move to Sony A1 from Sony A99 ii. I plan to continue to use the Sony F4 500 G lens (A mount lens) with an adapter on the Sony A1. However, I cannot find the menu option to do the AF Micro Adj in the Sony A1.  In the Sony A99ii it was under the AF3 menu. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...