Jump to content

Lense for Astro photography


Defyyy
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
On 9/3/2018 at 8:31 PM, Defyyy said:

Hey guys,

i want a lens for my a7r2 to make some sick astro shots any recommendations?

i thought about the Sigma AF 1,4/20 DG HSM A Sony FE-Mount

 

 

Just a suggestion ... you may want to look into using an old SLR lens with an adapter. When looking at the sky focus is not an issue (everything is at infinity) and fiddling-with-exposure is half-the-fun (and most of the older SLR lenses are relatively inexpensive).

Here, attached, is a picture I took a few days ago from my driveway about 10:30 at night.

Camera        - Sony A7iii 'mirrorless' digital
Lens          - Canon 55mm f/1.2
Exposure Time - 1/60th sec
Aperture      - f/1.2
'ISO'         - 12,800

I used 'IrfanView' and tweaked the gamma to suppress big-city sky brightness and pull-up the stars. (In the future I hope to be able to do some 'dark frame' noise subtraction but haven't learned what software to use yet.)

Best Regards;

- Paul

 

DSC00068 -p -r.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2018 at 8:31 PM, Defyyy said:

Hey guys,

i want a lens for my a7r2 to make some sick astro shots any recommendations?

i thought about the Sigma AF 1,4/20 DG HSM A Sony FE-Mount

 

 

Here's a picture of the Moon that I took about an hour ago from my driveway (the Moon is so bright that streetlights don't cause any significant problem). It was taken with my Sony A7iii Camera and the Canon FD-series 500mm/f8 catadioptric mirror lens using a purely mechanical lens adapter.

- Paul

 

DSC00087 -e3.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chrissie said:

That's quite a remarkable result, considering the rather low price of this lens. 

Thanks but it wasn't difficult. The Sony A7iii Camera has an internal 'zoom' feature (somehow not the same as a 'digital zoom') and it allows for a X2 multiplier (I suppose that gave the equivelent of a 1,000mm focal length lens). What's frustrating is that there's a X10 focusing aid multiplier ... with that on lunar features are really visible .... but there's no way (that I know of) to take a photo with that active.

- Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By DMFM
      I need to replace the top mode dial (the "select manual, aperture priority, auto, etc." dial) on my A7r2. I have the replacement Sony part. Can't figure out how to switch it out though! Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks and thanks again.
    • By M Nugent
      Can anyone tell me what is used to secure the model dial on a A7R2?.  Mine will not stay attached and falls off easily. The inside of the wheel appears to have some kind flexible adhesive, but its is slippery or waxy, and doesn't appears to be an adhesive at all.  Thank you


    • By danhopen
      Hi!
      I tried astrophotography for the first time this weekend, and have a few questions.
      I've read many times that an F4 lens isn't fast enough for astrophotography, but it was my only option this weekend. I think the outcome was far better than I expected, although my "standard" for results probably isn't that high.
      Anyway - I tried 30 seconds F4 on approximately 16mm, on a tripod of course. I can see glimpses of the milky way, but not as clearly as the "typical" astro-photo you'd see from an experienced photographer.
      Question 1: Which camera settings (shutter speed, aperture, iso) is preferable in order to capture the milky way?
      Question 2: Is it not enough with only one photo or are you supposed to stack multiple photos?
      Question 3: What is the benefit of stacking photos - will the milky away appear more clearly, or is it to reduce noice?
      Feel free to advice me (and other beginners) on how to make the milky way appear more clearly. I'm sure the camera settings should have been different .
      I'll throw in a couple of sample images from this weekend. Both are edited in LR.


    • By cws
      Still loving my A7R2....   just finished a surfing trip to Maldives aboard a boat for 10 days...  we were parked a fair distance from the surf break and longest lens I had was my FE 4/70-200 G OSS.
      While I got some OK shots I could crop into... nothing was close enough.
      I borrowed our surf guide's Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 A022 with Canon mount and used it on my Metabones EF-E mount.......    even at 600mm there was still a lot of wasted real estate in the pixels, and although I used a monopod to carry the weight, it was very hard to stop even tiniest movements on a rocking boat...  but still managed to get some magic for my mates when I wasn't surfing.
      Original frame reduced to 10% size, and then crop into 1:1 frame to 1800x1200px.    
      1/800th sec, f11, auto ISO 800, manual focus trying to lock into the distant area for faster shooting (although automatic focus still worked)
      Probably should have stayed at at least 1000th sec.
      Very happy I got some useable closer shots.... older blokes can still have a lot of fun!
       



    • By PHW
      Raging wild fire in California.  The ashes covers large part of sky, and gives a strange hue.   Sunset in the distance glows in unusual cherry red.  Not a happy day for those who lost their houses 30 miles from where this photo was taken earlier today.  Cross my fingers for those brave firefighters.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...