Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please explain! I made about 25 pictures with my A 6000 at different days. After that I could display all pictures as usual. Few days ago I could display and see only 6 pictures while others (made on one particular day)  were not displayed with the explanation: "unable to display". The numbers were running but the pictures were not displayed. Also when I put the card into computer the same pictures were not displayed. But when I checked the properties of the card the size on the card is containing also the MB ob non displayed pictures. Please share the similar experience  and eventually make me understand what happened! Thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you do ANYTHING to the SoC images other 

than view them ? The camera FW will only show 

"virgin, uncorrupted" image files.  

  

My PC will show images that my camera will not 

show, images that I accidentally re-saved to the 

card after rotating or otherwise altering them on 

the PC. But your viewing software on your PC is 

likely not the same as mine... and is perhaps just 

as "discriminating" as the camera's FW. After all, 

if the weight of the files is undiminished, then the 

files are there ... but they have been altered. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • In the old film days it made a lot of sense to invest in lenses and film than in the body.  Today, a more balanced approach is needed. Speaking of cheap lenses, what I have often noticed is great sample variability, I have two fairly good SEL 16-50 kit lens that came with my cameras, but I have tested one from a friend that was horrible, completely decentered. 
    • You are correct for the Voigtlanders I own - the aperture ring is mechanical. It tells the camera what the aperture is, but yeah, no control from the camera.
    • When I was shooting film, I used to buy an inexpensive body and pair it with an expensive lens and shoot with pro film. Now I'm doing the opposite.  The body cost so much, I've been trying to get by with inexpensive lenses with predictable results. I've also been buying some inexpensive Chinese made binoculars (actually, almost all binoculars are Chinese made) with pretty impressive performance and was hoping for the same with camera lenses. Seems I'm far more critical of the performance of camera lenses. I just ordered some lens test charts. Amazon.com : DGK Color Tools High Resolution 8.5x11" Chrome SD Professional Lens Test Chart, 3-Pack : Office And School Rulers : Electronics I don't have a really good lens to compare my cheap lenses against, but I can test them against each other and see where I need to do more shopping. There may be a price point where performance is both acceptable and affordable.  I'm hoping.  I'm pretty sure my Samyang 100mm macro lens is pretty good.  My Meike 50mm is pretty questionable.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...