Jump to content

Shots with M42 adaptor all black!


Mike Feldman
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to use a Fotodiox M42 to NEX adaptor with my Sony a7Sii.

I'm using an Asahi Super-Takumar 1:1.4 / 50mm lens from my (Honeywell!) Pentax Spotmatic.

I've watched a few a7Sii videos covering manual lenses and gone through all the menus.

I get very nice monitor images with peaking for focus assist and zebra for exposure assist.

 

I've got SteadyShot Adjust set to Manual and the Focal length set to 50.

 

But when I shoot an image (in M mode), the result is all black!

 

Hitting the C3 button gives the message "!LENS The lens is not attached correctly or is not supported".

I imagine that's to be expected with a manual lens.  Also, I'm not surprised that the f-stop shows as "F--".

 

But I'm at a loss to figure out how to get an image that's other than all-black.

 

-- Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a function in the menu that enables firing the shutter without lens attached. Manual legacy glass is (from the camera body's perspective) essentially "no lens attached", as the connection is purely mechanical without electronic communication. Make sure that function is enabled in your menu. That may be the reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem is that I do not know what that function is named, so I have yet to discover it.

 

I did discover that I do get (more or less) proper exposures with my legacy ("dead glass") lens shooting in AUTO mode and in A mode.

 

So perhaps the shots that are all black in M mode were just seriously under exposed?

I'm still learning how to read the detailed information stored in the image, but the all black images were blinking in playback mode,

whereas only the overexposed parts blink in otherwise normal exposures.

 

-- Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is a shot of the back of my A7R II with that function selected. I cannot imagine that it would be vastly different in A7S II.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the detailed setting.  I did indeed have "Release w/o Lens" enabled, so that wasn't my problem.

 

As I said, I got decent exposures shooting in AUTO and Aperture Priority modes.  So I've just got to figure out what Manual setting was preventing any non-black pixels.

 

 

-- Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem is that I do not know what that function is named, so I have yet to discover it.

 

I did discover that I do get (more or less) proper exposures with my legacy ("dead glass") lens shooting in AUTO mode and in A mode.

 

So perhaps the shots that are all black in M mode were just seriously under exposed?

I'm still learning how to read the detailed information stored in the image, but the all black images were blinking in playback mode,

whereas only the overexposed parts blink in otherwise normal exposures.

 

-- Mike

   

Sounds like blown-away bald white frames. 

Turn of the highlight blinkies and see what 

happens [or just view the frames on a PC]. 

  

Maybe you are forgetting to stop down or

maybe releasing the shutter while no lens 

is on the body. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • We seem to have similar ideas here. I'm not buying until I get ashore (or until I know anything I buy will show up at the house after I do); right now I'm looking at how much camera I can get, then balancing lens options. When I pack, I usually have a combination: Fast prime (either wide or tele, depending on the nature of the trip). If it's a wide prime, I bring a long zoom. If it's a tele, I bring a wide zoom. I only use a super zoom (18-300DX or 28-300FX) if I can't swap lenses. They're (comparatively) slow and heavy, so they are only worth hauling around if it means I don't have to carry a bag. For her, I'm thinking a wide zoom (16-50 OSS seems to be popular?) and a tele (no idea but thinking 80 or 100mm is a good first tele).  Lighter lenses. If she wants a heavy lens she can use one of my Nikkors.  On the best kind of lens adapter: the original camera.  If she likes the lens, I'll put it on her birthday list. The first couple lenses for her are going to be APS-C, size and weight were two of the things she didn't like about the Nikons.  Is there even a reason to move to full frame?  We're not shooting billboard ads.  And I do have the D600 if someone asks me to...
    • The A6000 doesn't have IBIS. I would definitely get her one with stabilization. One other point, Sony E mount will take both their APS-C and FF lenses. If she decided to stick with it and add lenses, she can use FF if she likes, then if she ever decided to go with a FF camera she'd have some lenses to get started. 
    • All good thoughts so far!  And thank you for the warm welcome. Olaf--If it were up to me, I'd get her a used Nikon D3400 to learn on (it's similar in size and weight to the A7C II, and has access to my many lenses), and then let her decide what features are most important to her when she moves to a mirrorless system.  I would know the technical specs and menu options and settings.  As an engineer, it's a great solution.  As a boyfriend, I can tell you it's not gonna work, lol.  The A6000 (or a used a6000-a6400) is probably a good move as long as I can keep learning it a bit faster than she does... Cameratose--currently, I'm on a ship in the mid-Atlantic.  Home (and girlfriend) are in Maine, USA (which is what you probably meant when you asked, lol).  I've also shopped at KEH, Adorama, B&H, and local used shops with good success.  I think a used a6x00 with a couple lenses is the direction I'm going to steer her toward, and probably a good Sony guide from Amazon (as well as trying to get a good head start on YouTube). FunWithCameras--Old kit is old kit.  My "new" cameras are a 2012-ish D600 and a 2013-ish D7100.  My lenses date back to the 1960s; I regularly use my AI-converted metal-focus-ring 50mm F/1.4 and 105mm F/2.5 (although I do have modern lenses too).  I don't mind buying her an a6000 or other "old" camera to learn on; we're going to spend more on lenses and accessories that will follow her from camera to camera.  There's a lot of 1980s 105mm F/2.8 AI-S Micro-Nikkors on eBay for $100 still, even though they're old kit.  My 2006-ish $2000 D200 was barely worth $100 in trade when I bought my Fujifilm X100T in 2014.  Lenses are an investment, but cameras are old kit shortly after you read the press release.   The ZV-E10 might be a good compromise for a simpler camera, though, I'll see if it appeals to her more than the a6x00 series.        
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...