Jump to content
FunkyBrewster

Best workflow and final format for imported/edited video?

Recommended Posts

I've recently begun shooting video with my a6000 and am finding it to be more confusing than I expected. The camera does a good job, although I need to get a new SD card to use the XAVC format (the one I have is only 8GB Class 10, 30MB/s). I'm shooting in AVCHD 60p in the meantime.

I read on some older posts and heard in YouTube videos that many people shoot in XAVC and then export to .mp4 with a smaller bitrate after editing. Obviously this has been done for anything on YouTube, but even after down converting, you can see the difference in AVCHD/XAVC codec quality they are trying to show you. That made me think that I should do the same thing.

Could someone suggest what a good workflow is for saving mostly family/kid movies shot with the a6000? I want to take advantage of the superior XAVC codec while balancing quality with size in the final file that gets archived. The only video software I have now is Playmemories Home and Windows Movie Maker (not sure that's compatible with XAVC though). I don't want to buy expensive software at this stage - I only need to do simple, minor edits and splices for now. I'm not overly concerned about compatibility with hardware players.

Sorry for being longwinded about a newbie question, but searching has turned up nothing useful for me about this topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

Check out DaVinci Resolve Lite, which is free and a rather powerful NLE and Colour Correction tool. A subscription to Adobe Premiere is rather inexpensive too and is a fully-fledged tool used in the industry.

 

You will want to shoot XAVC-S in-camera as opposed to AVCHD. It's a more robust codec with a higher bitrate to support the data load from the camera.

 

In a perfect world, you could use an external recorder like an Atomos Ninja/Shogun to record an uncompressed feed to Prores or DNxHD. This gives you more headroom to play with color correction and post, and while you'll be dealing with significantly higher data rates, it is much less taxing on your CPU to crunch.

 

YouTube uses the VP9/VP10 codecs for distribution, but I'd recommend exporting your final output video in either Quicktime H.264 or Prores 422LT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Could someone suggest what a good workflow is for saving mostly family/kid movies shot with the a6000?"

 

" exporting your final output video in either Quicktime H.264 or Prores 422LT"

 

"then export to .mp4"

 

After reading through the two posts I think there is a little confusion. There are codecs and there are file containers. Prores 422 & h264 are codecs, the algorithms for the compression, .mp4 is the Quicktime file container.  

 

Allow me to be a little insensitive towards your family videos, no disrespect,  but you probably don't need to bloat your archive with Prores 422 a much more robust editing codec.

 

I would keep the files your camera makes wether you set it for mp4, XAVC-S or AVCHD.  Again are you really going to need optimal quality for family pics or more likely a faster turn around within your light editing suite? I shoot a lot of stuff with my camera setting to .mp4 just like sometimes its more practical to shoot jpeg verses raw.  I know they are test shots or that the clips aren't intended to go into a real work sequence that's going to get color corrected, etc... they're just for fun.  Do we really care old family vhs videos look like cr@p no it's the content for the memories.

 

Once you've edited together your clips into a sequence then I would output that to the specified requirements where you are going to post it.  Youtube has guidelines as does Facebook as do most social media sites.  Right now(2017) I would assume most want an mp4 compressed with h264 codec. While you can keep this exported file, it would Not be my archive file, those would be the original clips you downloaded from your camera. Five years from now Facebook/utube sites might be asking for h265.  this is why you want to keep your original files because in the future if you need to use those clips again you might need to re-render (export) the "spliced together" sequence to the new requirements.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By OmrMor
      Hello,
      I've been having a problem when recording with my Sony A6300.
      The problem is that every time I start recording, it automatically stops at the 20th second.  I've tried to change the settings and see if the problem has to do with that but no, I even bought Sony's sd xc I U3 64GB
       memory card and nothing has changed. I would like to know if somebody else has this problem and how it can be fixed.
       
    • By zahtar
      Hello


       
      I am shooting with an a6000 and have a question regarding face detection.


       
      I am shooting a group of people and the camera detects 3-4 faces, without face registration. Is there a way to toggle between the detected faces? For example I don’t want to focus on the person at the far left, I want to change focus to the person in the middle.


       
      I am asking for a direct way, not a workaround, just a quick and easy way. So that means no face registration either.


       
      Thanks in advance


       
      PS: I am currently doing workarounds like recompose, lock-on AF etc, looking for something more efficient

    • By JWTPhoto
      Hi all,

      This is my first post here, but why not introduce myself first? Relatively new Sony user. Have an A6000 with the 16-50 and 55-210 kit lenses. I mostly shoot wide landscape, but am venturing into portraiture and I take the occasional wildlife/tighter landscape shot... So, looking for a trio of lenses.
      I'm thinking a prime and two zooms, or just three primes. Not sure. I like the flexibility of the zoom but realize that primes tend to be sharper, which I like for my landscapes. Looking at the Rokinon 12mm F2 for UWA landscapes or the Sigma 16mm (which I've heard great things about). And then a 24-70, and then maybe a 70-200 for the zoomed-in shots. Not too sure.
      Any help and suggestions are greatly appreciated.

      Cheers!
      Jack.
    • By elenichatzo
      1) Thessaloniki

       
      2) Athens

       
      3) Kallikrateia, Halkidiki

       
      4) Zagoroxoria, Ioannina
        https://www.flickr.com/photos/elenichatzo/26473151597/in/dateposted-public/
       
       
    • By elenichatzo
      Hello,
      I'm new to photography but I will attend photography classes/lessons because I want to learn more and become better..
      I really like almost any kind of photography but mostly street, landscapes, cityscapes, astrography, light trails, star trails and timelapse videos.. I use the Sony A6000 with the kit lens (16-50mm) , a Neewer 35mm F1,7 and a Goko 70-210mm  F4 and all I want to ask is If I can use any of these lenses for astrography/star trails and If yes whice lens..
      Also, any recommendation of any lens that is more appropriate for this kind of staff is more than welcome.
       
      Thank you
×