Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I currently own an A7S ii and primarily use it for shooting weddings and other events (some of which are outdoors at night so I go up to 25,600 iso sometimes). I'm looking for a second camera that I can use on my gimbal and tripod during ceremony etc.. and to replace my A7sii if it fails. Both the A6500 and the A7s fall within my budget and I generally shoot in 1080p (although I use 4K on my A7sii sometimes to be able to crop in during post). Been reading a lot about the two and each option has its pro's and con's. Unfortunately I cannot wait for new models as I need the camera for a wedding I'm shooting solo in 3 weeks.

 

What would be your suggestions?

 

Thanks!

Ernest

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

`    

   

Could depend on possible other uses for the second body. 

If it's strictly video, and if  you have a cage or other reason 

to prefer a similar body, get the 7S. But if it will see use for

general photo, or maybe stills at your weddings, the totally 

silent shutter of the 6500 plus IBIS should prove useful. If 

it is gonna handle some general photo use, you'll also get 

24MP with the 6500. One needn't be the least bit of a pixel 

peeping geek to find 24MP advantageous over 12MP with  

routine still camera applications destined for hard copy. i'd 

say it all depends on whether it's mainly a dedicated video 

body or a multi-use body, and that these are very polarized 

concerns. IOW, 7S for video-only, 6500 for anything else, 

and no "grey area" in that choice. Even 25% general use 

speaks strongly for the 6500 ... after all, it's not the primary 

unit on the video side. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...