Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a number of lenses for my a550 but I get a number of water spots when shooting with my el cheapo Sony SAL1855. I think I have narrowed it down to that lens but have tried cleaning the front of the lens and both sides of the clear filter and the spots seem to continue. I'm afraid to clean the inner part of the lens and wouldn't know how to clean inside the camera on the mirror or whatever. Any suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

So, the spots show in the pictures? The it's most likely dust (or specks) on the sensor or rear element of the lens. Try a rubber blower first but if that doesn't help, wet cleaning is the next step. There are good sensor cleaning kits with swabs and liquid available in camera stores or online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I've got a bit of a sensor cleaning problem.

I've used a wet cleaning kit several times aready but there are some areas of dirt clearly encrusted on the surface of the sensor. They always show up in images with apertures of around f11 or smaller.

Do you have any thoughts on getting rid of them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Jaf-Photo

Sensor cleaning in camera stores differs depending on who does it. Sometimes, they are no better than you and take less care.

 

It's not difficult to do as long as you think through the process before you start.

 

It's true hat the better advice is to avoid dirtying the sensor but accidents do happen. If you have a set of swabs and liquid, you can fix the problem in five minutes.

 

Do check the back of your lens OP. Spots on the rear element are more visible in the pictures than spots on the front element.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not like to clean the mirror myself other than with air. It has

a risk to scratch or other problems. You would better sent it to Nikon.

     

I doubt that Nikon would clean a Sony, but ... fear not !  

The a550 is not only not a Nikon, it is also not an SLT.

It has some weird live view features, but it is basically

just a regular flip-mirror SLR.   

   

The mirror is the SAFEST thing you can clean in your 

SLR body. Lenses are fairly safe but, like sensors, they 

are involved in forming your images. The mirror in an 

SLR does NOT form your images, and sometimes has

a few "scratches" engineered right into it. Not actually 

careless scratches, but mirrors have historically had a 

variety of grooves, grids, etc built into them that would 

really mess up your images if the mirror were involved  

in forming your images. 

   

If you put a minor scratch on a mirror it's diddley squat.   

   

The REAL danger in cleaning a mirror is that if you use 

too much force, you may misalign it, and your focus will

be inaccurate.   

   

OTOH, just as scratches on the mirror are meaningless 

so also is any minor dirt, so there's seldom any reason  

to clean an SLR mirror.   

    

---------------------------------------------------------------------   

    

OTOOH if you have a Sony SLT mirror, that is a waaay 

different kettle of fish. Verrrry risky ! An SLT mirror IS

in the image forming path. 

   

  

 

    

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...