Jump to content

Using Sigma MC-11 with Zeiss Milvus lens


Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

does anyone have experience using Sigma MC-11 with a Milvus lens? Am interested to know if the metadata from the lens is communicated, and naturally, that the aperture is controlled correctly from the camera.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, let me answer my own questions.

 

Metadata is communicated, Lens shows as "DT 50mm F2 SAM", aperture is included. Seems that the Steadyshot is picking up the focal length too. So that is all great!

 

Aperture control, it seems that the aperture is adjusted when the shot is taken, so at least for now I have to focus at f2. Have to see if that will be a problem ... perhaps there is some setting for DOF Preview? Anyway ...

 

 

The Milvus lens itself is wonderful, really well built, and the adapter was very well packaged too. The combined size of lens and adapter is somewhere between a Batis 25 and 85, however the weight is a hefty 836g. Still, its all metal and really impressive. Here is how it looks ...

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've assigned Aperture Preview to the centre button, for a DOF Preview. That works.

 

Probably the only thing missing is Automatic MF-Assist ... I guess that the Zeiss Lens does not signal changes in focus. Will take it for a walk tomorrow, try to find some butterflies ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my 7-II set to use something beyond just 

aperture preview. Can't recall it's feature name, 

some sort of "image preview". It INCLUDES iris 

stop down but also WB, exposure etc. Might as 

well preview how your DoF looks on your actual

shot with the color, contrast, brightness, etc, etc 

cuz some of that does affect the impression of 

sharpness as well as "real" DoF :-)  

   

FWIW I put it on the C3 button next to the EVF. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have to do that too I think, "image preview" rather than "aperture preview".

 

What I find is that the exposure is metered at f2 (lens is normally wide open, actually a useful thing), and then calculated for the target aperture based on that reading, and that calculation is influenced by the natural vignetting of the lens ... so ... the shots at smaller apertures are over-exposed. The smaller the aperture the greater the error, due to compounding, naturally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Does the aperture iris of you lens stay wide open when you adjust the f-stop? And then stop down only when you press shutter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.. exactly that way. It stays wide open and only adjusts the aperture during the shot. I guess its due to the vignetting, but the effect is quite dramatic. In the german sonyuserforum a member has the milvus 85 on the metabones and has no such issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean that with the metabones adapter the aperture is _not_ staying wide open all the time? That would be interesting, since as you mention, I too think the vignetting is causing the problem - the camera is metering at wide open, calculating the end exposure, and then setting the aperture based on that ... so the vignetting impacts on that calculations accuracy.

 

So far I got used to dialling in some exposure compensation ... trial and error at first ... but now its just about automatic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have it (aperture preview) on the centre button    :)

 

Actually, having the lens normally wide open is _really_ useful for getting exact focus ... so I like that part a lot!

 

I'm using the Milvus 2/50M, its wonderful, really great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the problem the other way, wide open exposure is OK, as you would expect, stopped down I get over-exposure and need to apply -ve exposure compensation. The metering (centre, spot, and what_ever_the_other_one_is_called) probably has an impact too.

 

Perhaps there are other factors. For sure, with my camera, the metering is being measured with the lens wide open and then calculated to the target aperture ... OK ... perhaps if I update the firmware of my camera that changes.

 

Anyway, not much to do about that ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...