Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I have recently purchased the a6500 and coming from SLR canon I have some lenses that I would continue to use. For this reason I had purchased the commlite adapter, but unfortunately it is totally incompatible, because nothing works. So I would ask what for canon lens adapter on sony a6500? Excluding the metabones adapter which for me is over budget.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Commlite + a6500 seems to be working fine for me. I also have a Vello "Accelerator" lens adapter (focal reducer like SpeedBooster) I was hoping to use with FF lenses, but it causes blurring at the frame edges. And I agree, the Metabones are on the fringe of budget feasibility, you would have to have a lot of lenses to adapt for it to be worth the cost.

 

Commlite successes: Canon 17-55 f2.8, Canon 10-22, Tamron 60mm macro (but forget about autofocus), and of course all kinds of vintage m42 lenses with dumb adapters.

 

Vello Accelerator successes: Vintage lenses only so far. I don't have any modern full frame lenses to try this with. I got it on sale on a whim and was hoping to buy a used Canon 24-105 or something for it, but was disappointed with the frame edge quality. So I can't really vouch for this adapter, I don't use it much. Probably good for portraits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a "king" adapter and it works just as well in virtually every respect, as the Metabones II and III that I had and sold.  However I don't know if you can find King any longer...a China product I got for around $80 as I recall.  I think the adapters are generally an example of where you do not get what you pay for.  Paying $400 for a metabones is just hard for me to understand.  I got one on Craigslist here for $95 and sold it for $300 on Ebay, so I guess there is that going for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that it makes us ILC users feel any better .... but 

the reason that top shelf adapters are high priced is 

that they originated, and still thrive, in the profession 

productions evironment of the cine/video bizniz, Just 

browse the prices of true productions quality lenses 

and other acoutraments in that field and you'll see 

that $400 to $600 for the most reliable adapters is 

the low end of the price range. 

   

My Metabones "dumb" adapter cost several time the 

price of the inexpensive adapters I've tried. And altho

the inexpensive ones were sufficient, the Metabones 

is distinctly better. Is it several times better ? NO it's 

not, but it IS distinctly better. While it is NOT several 

times better, it IS $75 better. Being a very low cost 

item in the world of quality cine/video devices, the 

several fold price hike amounted to only $75 :-) So I 

have no complaint. OTOH in that same cine/video 

professional productions world, any item under $1K 

is a minor item, so do realize that $700 for a Speed 

Booster instead of $150 for brand-X knock-off is, to 

those in that world, the same thing as the $75 that I 

willingly paid for a better "dumb" adapter. $700 will 

adapt a $10,000 lens to $10,000 camera, to allow a 

$50,000 short cine spot to be filmed. Would a $150 

adapter also do the thing ? For that negligible $550 

savings, why risk it ? 

 

  

There's no denying that when we ILC users consider

buying items "born of, and raised in" the cine/video 

profession then the prices his US as outrageous, but 

thaz how it is. These are not "our" chatzkes. We are 

Burger King employees trying to buy a dinner in the 

most most expensive districts of Manhattan, London, 

or Paris. Sticker shock is inevitable :-(  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...