Jump to content

I did it .. Pre Ordered 2 x a99II, dump the E Mount

Recommended Posts

Guest Jaf-Photo

Nice move, man. It's great that Sony offers good choices for pros now. There' a great range of class-leading cameras for different uses and preferences.


Keep us posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You realise there is a pro-level E-mount camera rumoured for early next year, that will no doubt fix the issues you speak of.


The A6500 indicates that buffer issues will soon be a thing of the past for E-mount too, as it has a new front-end LSI like the A99 II.


I'm sure the A99 II will do a great job for you, but I wouldn't plan on selling any E-mount glass you have just yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You realise there is a pro-level E-mount camera rumoured for early next year, that will no doubt fix the issues you speak of.


But how expensive is it going to be? And how before it gets released?  And how long after that until it actually ships?

The A99II matches the price of the A7RII.  The future pro-level E-mount can only be more expensive than that.  And with the exception of the 70-200 range, the A-mount glass is cheaper and more abundant than any E-mount equivalent.  And the choice of E-mount lenses is still quite limited.


Why wait another year or two, just to pay more money for something we can get right now for less?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • I mostly see posterization artifacts, which are the result of lossy compressed RAW files (or bad jpeg conversion). Unfortunately, the A6400 doesn't offer uncompressed or lossless compressed RAW. The noise might indeed result from the smaller sensor than what you're used to. If you're not shooting at max aperture, you could try shooting at wider aperture and lower ISO. When you're not shooting at max aperture, fullframe versus APS-C shouldn't matter much in terms of ISO-performance combined with depth of field: at the same ISO and aperture value, fullframe offers better noise performance but with a narrower depth of field. This can be offset by choosing a larger aperture and lower ISO on the APS-C camera. If you want a fullframe camera the size of an A6400, try the A7C(ii).
    • ..unfortunately, the lighting was correct. The shot required deeper shadows. The K1 ff didnt have these banding issues [yes, I know the sensor is larger]. The film shots had details in the same light. The sony files, both the jpg and raw, had this banding/noise - with NO retouch or post adjustments [straight out of the camera]. the camera was purchased new a few years ago and I am trying to determine if there is something wrong, or the settings are wrong, or the camera just cant handle this kind of lighting [studio + softbox]. No shadow detail is one thing... banding/noise in the shadows is unacceptable. Does sony have a body this size that is FF ? Im wondering if that would make a difference..  dw
    • The root causes for banding are uneven lighting, incorrect exposure settings, or compression artefacts or certain kinds of artificial lighting, especially LED lights. Also the lens used plays a role, I have noticed it more with my sharpest lenses, looks like they outresolve the sensor when I have a uniform blue sky. There is more than one solution, and ultimately post-processing, but the root cause has to be identified first.
  • Topics

  • Create New...