Jump to content

what lens is suitable for me?


kellysummerell
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Another fine lens would be the Rokinon/Samyang 12mm/F2.0 NCS CS. It's affordable and provides a good wide angle of view. It's manual though. But that should be for no concern for landscape photography.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, 

I have the sony a6000 and I am really interested in landscape photography!

I would like someone to recommend a good "wide angle lens" for me! Can

someone give me some advice!?

Thanks you, much appreciated!!! :)

Kelly 

   

Advice ? For Landscape ? My advice is "Avoid the wide angle 

assumption". Have you done many landscapes with normal or 

"portrait" lenses ? Any landscape vista thaz at a distance will 

be imaged as a wide view, even when shot with a telephoto. 

  

Ultrawide perspective applied to landscapes typically imposes 

the "Camera Club Cliche" look. If you are a CC competitor you 

certainly need to execute the in-demand cliches to score well. 

But if you want to explore and expand your vision, relegate the 

ultrawides to what they are intended for: Interiors and cramped 

views of large architectural subjects. 

   

A fine shorter than normal lens for landscapes with the APSC 

format would be lenses like the 19mm Sigma or 20mm Sony. 

There's a whole heap of vintage 24mm SLR lenses that you 

can adapt, and these will barely nick your budget :-)  Also if you 

use a polarizer to help unveil your colors, you will get a uniform 

result all across the format with lenses in this FL range ... and 

budget-wise again, the polarizer will not be huge and pricey.  

    

You can even pick up cheaply an old polarizer that no one else 

would buy cuz it's not a Circular Polarizer. I've noticed that it's a

shamefully well-kept "secret" that you don't need a CP. [Those

are for certain SLR designs ... not even all SLRs].

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best lens for your purposes (and the A 6000) is the Sony E 4,0/10-15 mm OSS. In my opinion  it is one of the best wide-angle zooms ever, regardless of the manufacturer! Especially in the WW area, it often comes from every focal length millimeter and there a zoom is of enormous advantage.

Alternatively, but more expensive, the Zeiss Touit 2.8/12 mm is recommended. It has no image stabilization (OSS), what ist not necessarily required at this focal range!

To the other alternatives (Samyang etc.) I can´t make any statements, but they have no autofokus.

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I mostly see posterization artifacts, which are the result of lossy compressed RAW files (or bad jpeg conversion). Unfortunately, the A6400 doesn't offer uncompressed or lossless compressed RAW. The noise might indeed result from the smaller sensor than what you're used to. If you're not shooting at max aperture, you could try shooting at wider aperture and lower ISO. When you're not shooting at max aperture, fullframe versus APS-C shouldn't matter much in terms of ISO-performance combined with depth of field: at the same ISO and aperture value, fullframe offers better noise performance but with a narrower depth of field. This can be offset by choosing a larger aperture and lower ISO on the APS-C camera. If you want a fullframe camera the size of an A6400, try the A7C(ii).
    • ..unfortunately, the lighting was correct. The shot required deeper shadows. The K1 ff didnt have these banding issues [yes, I know the sensor is larger]. The film shots had details in the same light. The sony files, both the jpg and raw, had this banding/noise - with NO retouch or post adjustments [straight out of the camera]. the camera was purchased new a few years ago and I am trying to determine if there is something wrong, or the settings are wrong, or the camera just cant handle this kind of lighting [studio + softbox]. No shadow detail is one thing... banding/noise in the shadows is unacceptable. Does sony have a body this size that is FF ? Im wondering if that would make a difference..  dw
    • The root causes for banding are uneven lighting, incorrect exposure settings, or compression artefacts or certain kinds of artificial lighting, especially LED lights. Also the lens used plays a role, I have noticed it more with my sharpest lenses, looks like they outresolve the sensor when I have a uniform blue sky. There is more than one solution, and ultimately post-processing, but the root cause has to be identified first.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...