Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been using fast 35mm primes as my main lens for a few years now and the Voigtlander 35/1.2 always intrigued me as it is the fastest 35mm that I knew of, so a soon as the a7R was introduced I knew it was time own one.

 

The a7R didn't last long however, as a low light shooter it just wasn't the right camera for me plus I didn't like how it demoted my legacy lenses to pieces of junk. Luckily Sony didn't wait long to provide me with the perfect escape route out of an otherwise bad investment in the form of the amazing a7S, a long awaited mirrorless successor of my beloved D3s (what a beast that was).

 

The Voigtlander 35/1.2 is an awesome and unique lens, the way it renders the out of focus background wide-open is just stunning as is the smooth transition from sharp to the out of focus zone. Wide open there is a nice glow which gives this lens some character which aids in the smooth boke, that said I would like my main lens to be a bit sharper and contrasty wide-open for some extra pop so I'm secretly eyeballing the 35/1.4 FE.

 

Mugshots with the iPhone 5 and the Hipstamatic app (my other camera):

10994825413_e296854d9c_b.jpg

 

11014255385_d714e9a621_b.jpg

 

Here's a couple of images I took in Montenegro last year on a one week photo trip with my Nikon buddies, they gracefully allowed to me to tag along with my first Sony ;) All images where shot wide open at f/1.2 on the a7R.

 

14275269208_37d473e505_o.jpg

 

14288468568_67baa5c2f3_o.jpg

 

14445459596_31181d475b_o.jpg

 

And one with the a7S from a local museum in Amsterdam, haven't used this combo much but vignetting is a lot better than on the R:

14885860468_37db3729dc_o.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have this lens too and I use it on the a7.

 

I agree that the performance at f/1.2 is not overly exciting from a purely academic perspective. It has a "look" but I tend to use it only in particular situations. With a bit of patience in post results can be very good though, and at f/1.4 it already improves considerably (also bokeh-wise).

 

In fact, I love the rendering between f/1.4-4; at smaller apertures it becomes super sharp but loses a lot of character. 

 

It's a special lens that portraits people (and to some extent landscapes) in a very delicate and charming way. The build quality is so good that every time it's a pleasure to handle and use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This lens is best used with the Voigtlander Close adapter. Your close focus goes beyond anything you've experience before. Also it's in color that this lens shines and in color that one can evaluate such wide aperture lenses.
It's my main combo in my work.

Some examples in color.

https://scontent-mad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/10459924_1072685882759185_8179370898447492714_n.jpg?oh=155ceac6fc6962090a4081ffb1146fcc&oe=557A59BE

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/1780799_1052640934763680_7931159907340135018_n.jpg?oh=0eeae733215dd3d80f2860898e3cd8b7&oe=55B6A47B&__gda__=1433978023_6c27109422fc756fbd50ba52cba75c3a

Best wishes

https://www.facebook.com/MFotografia.JoaoMedeiros.PamelaLeite

Link to post
Share on other sites

This lens is best used with the Voigtlander Close adapter. Your close focus goes beyond anything you've experience before. 

Yes and no, yes it will allow me to get more creative with the closer focus but no I don't like to weigh down a 500 gram camera with another 90 gram all the time if I don't have to.

 

So, I usually have the lightweight (30 grams) and butter smooth Novoflex adapter mounted and the Voigtlander Close Focus adapter (120 grams) in the front pocket of my camera bag for when I need it.

 

Thanks for contributing btw :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I have this lens on an A7 with VM-E Close Focus adapter and I have to admit it's THE BEST lens I ever had. I always have best images whatever aperture and light conditions, with minimal post treatment in Lightroom. It's quite a heavy lens but would never trade it. Here are some samples of mine ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello,

 

Sorry for images, had to clean some things here...

Here is the link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/598kxxozizxxkq0/AAC4m_qx6vqdfSpGEP7xBY0va?dl=0

 

 

Well, mine is for sale ;)

 

Couldn't resist the 35/1.4 FE, wouldn't mind owning both but can't justify doing so.

 

I don't agree with this. For me sensation and results of a manual Voigtlander or Leica and an autofocus Sony lens can't be compared. You should keep them both, it's a real pleasure to be able to switch from one to another according to what you want to shoot or the result you expect. One can't replace the other even if technical specifications are the same (1.2 / 35 and 1.4 / 35). This Nokton is a master lens, really close to what you can get with a Leica Summilux, no autofocus can give you these results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just had mine delivered yesterday.  

Haven’t had a chance to play with it yet.

Yeah, wellll ... a REAL enthusiast

woulda called in sick, and posted

some pix awready !

 

OK, maybe you're a firefighter, or

an ER doc. But post pix tomorrow :-)

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an example on a7s.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Yeah, wellll ... a REAL enthusiast

woulda called in sick, and posted

some pix awready !

 

OK, maybe you're a firefighter, or

an ER doc. But post pix tomorrow :-)

 

`

:-)  you’re right; that’s what I should’ve done.

 

Anyhoo, I am thinking of acquiring this one again.  Pics from me, for sure, if that happens.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The shutter is always open on mirrorless. The first or front curtain closing starts the picture taking process, the second or rear curtain completes it. There is no 'shutter slit' That's why your A7 IV has the option to close the shutter on power-down. Shooting electronic shutter is handled 100% by the processor telling the camera when to start saving what the sensor sees and when to stop, in simple terms. I've shot SLR, DSLR, SLT, and mirrorless, and mirrorless is by far the best. I shoot film from time to time and still have a couple of old DSLRS, a Minolta Maxxum 5D and a Sony A350. I have gotten to seriously dislike optical viewfinders. I would never shoot SLT again. It may have been the predecessor to mirrorless, but it wasn't great technology.  The AF issue aside, I think you just need to spend more time with the mirrorless. I know a few guys who went back to DSLR for similar reasons, but they eventually ended up back in mirrorless. Since DSLR is going the way of the dinosaur, your options aren't many. Shoot older cameras or mirrorless.   
    • Maybe could help but I doubt that the camera will drive the lenses better. from fw 3.2 the AF was spectacular even with the Minolta 80-200, not even close to a77ii but i was expecting it to be quite lackluster. It was snappy and tracked cars moving at 30kmh towards me without an issue. It was when I updated to 4.0 when I felt like i had to get the Sigma lens, which offers roughly the same experience: good autofocus on slow objects, stays in place or back focused (especially back focusing) most of the shots. I've tried to see if you can downgrade the firmware, but I've seen negative results. ISO1250 and that's overexposed, iso800 and the detail remains. could be, since it's no SLT either you also need the shutter slit to be wide enough to let the sensor do autofocus. all in all I believe mirrorless cameras are a step back from dslr and SLT cameras The SLT A99II has proven to be the best autofocusing camera in the world and it still is, it's just that the gimmick of the mirrorless cameras can detect the eye of the subject and promise to obtain better action portraits because they focus on the eye or cockpit of the subject. Because of this I was going to go full onto the A7CII but when I read it can only do 1/4000 and has a single shutter curtain I really felt like that was two fundamental deal breakers. The lack of joystick also made me quack off but the A7IV joystick isn't joyful either, all in all I have realized that going from the A77II to the a7iv had just a single point for which was clear photos at iso 3200, because everything else is a serious downgrade: the battery life, the ergonomics, the button layout, the autofocus responsiveness, the shutter cycle duration (3ms for A77II and 5ms for A7IV) etc. I wanted an A99II (thus paying only half of what I had to pay to convert to E mount) but all the ones I've seen were outside the EU or in poor condition.
    • Man, that stinks. I still wouldn't give up on settings though. Have you tried doing a factory reset and starting from scratch? What about all of the firmware updates on the camera?  One other thing, you say you're shooting f/4 and 1/5000. That's pretty quick. What kind of ISO does that result in? These cameras need light to AF so they can see contrasts. Have you tried dropping the shutter to 1/2000, or even 1/1600? You'll gain a couple stops of light to the sensor. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...