Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been very satified with the functions of the Nissin Di700A and AIR commander. I wrote about it in October here on SAR: http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/guest-post-by-dierk-topp-the-new-nissin-di700a-air-1-wireless-ttl-flash-for-sony/

 

I use it with different setups like umbrellas and diffusers. Yesterday I noticed, that the flash was hanging down from the tripod, only fixed by the cable of the PS8 power pack. The diffuser has been mounted for a while as you see on the first image. The wheight of it is about 160 gr. very light!

 

Is the Di700A only for amateur use??

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Peter Kelly

That is worrying although, from my perspective, not at all surprising.

 

I have said from the start that I was never worried about the contacts of the new Sony foot/shoe (although most criticised them), but rather the strange 'lugged' design. Instead of them being solid 'runners', it always looked like a weak spot.

That said, the Sony HVL-F60M has a different problem in that the foot cracks around the base, leaving it usable but wobbly and slightly loose. I had to replace 3 feet while I owned them (and noticed the design of that part was changed!).

 

Unfortunately, I think it inevitable that having a large, heavy gun (not so much the weight, but rather the length of the leverage) will lead to a lot of strain at that point and if the foot is made to withstand severe pressure then that would be transferred to other parts; the worst case scenario being the hotshoe of the camera. I suspect the designers do consider that and think photographers will prefer swapping the foot (that's why those four screws are so obvious) than having an expensive camera repair if the shoe was ripped off.

 

I do know some colleagues, from the 'paparazzi' side of things, that prefer to use a bracket for their flash, or stick with the old 'hammerhead' design, to lessen the risk (as well as helping with mounting external batteries, etc.).

 

The bottom line is that when using physically big flashguns you need to be aware of the potential risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have three of these flashes and two have broken the foot. I only use the Di700A off camera and now only use a mount that holds the flash body not the foot. I agree with Peter, the leverage is the issue. On a bright note as I stated elsewhere in this forum Nissin (Minox USA) replaced the broken feet free of charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

examples of hot shoes:

the left one is a professional flash SB800 from Nikon, on the right is the broken plastic Nissin Di799A

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Peter Kelly

Certainly the Nikon foot is more like I would envisage, but the design still goes to possible issues when accidents happen.

 

I suspect most people would prefer a solid foot and for the shoe to be fully attached to the chassis, meaning that all but the most severe knocks could be shrugged off. Of course, in the case of such an accident you might suffer damage that would write off the whole camera (I've seen a Canon with the whole top plate ripped off).

 

With that in mind, in hindsight, perhaps people would have preferred to just replace a simple foot, in about 10 minutes.

 

The problem comes if the design gets the balance between these positions wrong and you find that you are replacing the foot every other time you use the camera. That becomes very tedious and annoying!

 

From these examples and my experience with the HVL-F60M I tend to believe Sony have erred too far on the side of weakness. I'd love to hear the designer's thoughts on it though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I have the same problem with the broken shoe.  I mistakenly used a clamp type flash holder while off camera flash remotely and the flash unit just barely leaned over and the plastic broke.  I have removed the shoe by removing the four screws and unplugged from junction system bottom of flash.  I am currently trying to find the replacement part by contacting Nissin: Air 1 Commander & Di700 A 

·  U.S.A.
New England Imaging Distribution, LLC
TEL:603-504-6317 / FAX:603-287-4834
741 Main Street, Claremont, NH 03743
info@NEIDLLC.com  I am hoping to find the part..     

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
    • I elected to upgrade from Sony A1 to the A1 ii and am seeing some significant focusing challenges in the little time I've spent with it so far. Less than 10% of photos appear to be in focus when photographing small birds in subject mode birds with seemingly no improvement when subject mode is changed to birds/animals/people. Scenario: Sony A1 ii, 200-600 G lens @ 600mm, F6.3, shutter speed on male cardinal (in-focus mostly) at 1/250 ISO 125 and female cardinal (nothing in focus) at 1/1600 ISO 100; AF-C set with eye supposedly in focus in both shots. Lens has AF on, OSS on, Mode 1. I've tried switching out lenses using 100-400 with and without 1.4X converter and used handheld and used tripod. Photos are at a distance of 20-25 yards. The photos below are within a couple yards of one another. There is seemingly no improvement in AF performance despite the combinations of lens, tripod and focus zones attempted. Birds are stationary. Many of the photos will have everything in the frame seemingly out of focus and some may have the head in focus and rest of body out of focus and immediate area around bird slightly out of focus at F9-F11. I considered that I was cropping too much and had pixel peeping / expectations problem, but some photos are wildly out of focus when supposedly focusing on eye or body. Neither photo below is cropped. Ideas are welcome!

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Agreed, but it's ancient thinking. Any modern forum lets you edit whenever. It's simply a setting they could click to turn off. It's one reason I won't post many photos here. After 10 minutes I lose complete control over my own property. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...