Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am currently using the A77 ii with the 70-400 G lens for shooting high school sports. I am wondering if the A6300 would be durable enough to replace the A77 ii. I may shoot a 1000 pics per game using high speed drive mode.  I understand I would have to use the LA-EA3 adapter if I wanted to use the 70-400 G lens. I'm not sure how the AF would be using the adapter and that lens for action shooting.  Any thoughts are appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A77 ii is still performing OK. I am starting to have some issues when using the 70-400. May just need a cleaning or adjustment but sometimes when following action and rotating camera (horizontal to vertical) I can feel movement at the mount and sometimes if kicks out of AF and into manual focus. Many time I have to push in the lens release button as if taking off and then lock back into place and it will be OK.  So not sure where the problem is. But I know the A6300 has more AF points but not sure if its faster or even improved over the A77 ii.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First I have to ask... Why replace the 77 with the 6300? Is there something wrong with the 77 or something you don't like? I don't think you will get overall better performance with 70 - 400 on the 6300.

The AF performance.  There is a good post in Alpha Universe where the official team photographer for the Arizona Cardinals used the a6300 with this same zoom lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.........  starting to have some issues when using the 70-400. May just

need a cleaning or adjustment but sometimes when following action

and rotating camera (horizontal to vertical) I can feel movement at the

mount and sometimes if kicks out of AF and into manual focus. Many

time I have to push in the lens release button as if taking off and then

lock back into place and it will be OK.  So not sure where the problem  

.........

  

You don't mention whether you have ever

cleaned the lens and body contacts .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleaned contacts lightly before but just cleaned lens

contacts again. Hope to try out early next week at a game.

  

Huh ?!?!!? That is sooooo not right. Test the damnt

thing immediately, before the results actually matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
    • I elected to upgrade from Sony A1 to the A1 ii and am seeing some significant focusing challenges in the little time I've spent with it so far. Less than 10% of photos appear to be in focus when photographing small birds in subject mode birds with seemingly no improvement when subject mode is changed to birds/animals/people. Scenario: Sony A1 ii, 200-600 G lens @ 600mm, F6.3, shutter speed on male cardinal (in-focus mostly) at 1/250 ISO 125 and female cardinal (nothing in focus) at 1/1600 ISO 100; AF-C set with eye supposedly in focus in both shots. Lens has AF on, OSS on, Mode 1. I've tried switching out lenses using 100-400 with and without 1.4X converter and used handheld and used tripod. Photos are at a distance of 20-25 yards. The photos below are within a couple yards of one another. There is seemingly no improvement in AF performance despite the combinations of lens, tripod and focus zones attempted. Birds are stationary. Many of the photos will have everything in the frame seemingly out of focus and some may have the head in focus and rest of body out of focus and immediate area around bird slightly out of focus at F9-F11. I considered that I was cropping too much and had pixel peeping / expectations problem, but some photos are wildly out of focus when supposedly focusing on eye or body. Neither photo below is cropped. Ideas are welcome!

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Agreed, but it's ancient thinking. Any modern forum lets you edit whenever. It's simply a setting they could click to turn off. It's one reason I won't post many photos here. After 10 minutes I lose complete control over my own property. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...