Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

At 200mm, it's less about increasing gear-to-subject

clearance ... the 105 accomplishes that for nearly

all applications. What you get at 200mm is an ability

to align subject foreground and background items to

assemble your visual message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As can be seen in the picture, no Nikon body

required. Maybe you will stumble upon a 200.

 

 

Nowadays (actually since maybe 6 or 7 years already) I shoot almost only Contax glass, and I got rid of all my remaining Nikon glass because it focuses "the wrong way" and mixing the two of them in the field was quite annoying. Besides, this way I can carry only one adapter like my A7r was instead a digital Contax RTS :)

 

That said, I'd sorely miss the 35/1.4 pre-Ai...my sample was yellower than a lemon, but it was super sharp especially from f/2 and it rendered beautifully (it was the first batch, the one with 9 aperture blades for better bokeh).

 

The 70-180 it was on paper really useful, but it was slow (not a big deal, I shoot mostly landscapes) and more importantly it had a rather flimsy tripod foot that hurt sharpness quite a bit. Let's say we didn't bond in the end...and after I found a second hand 180/2.8 AF-D the 70-180 got kicked out to the curb!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here another version ... and yes I was aware of the 

background lettering, and no it doesn't mean a thing.

I noticed it in the finder, and tweaked the framing to

crop off the letter "D", just on a whim. The image of 

the background as seen in the bottles discloses the 

story of the lettering anywho. 

  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
    • I elected to upgrade from Sony A1 to the A1 ii and am seeing some significant focusing challenges in the little time I've spent with it so far. Less than 10% of photos appear to be in focus when photographing small birds in subject mode birds with seemingly no improvement when subject mode is changed to birds/animals/people. Scenario: Sony A1 ii, 200-600 G lens @ 600mm, F6.3, shutter speed on male cardinal (in-focus mostly) at 1/250 ISO 125 and female cardinal (nothing in focus) at 1/1600 ISO 100; AF-C set with eye supposedly in focus in both shots. Lens has AF on, OSS on, Mode 1. I've tried switching out lenses using 100-400 with and without 1.4X converter and used handheld and used tripod. Photos are at a distance of 20-25 yards. The photos below are within a couple yards of one another. There is seemingly no improvement in AF performance despite the combinations of lens, tripod and focus zones attempted. Birds are stationary. Many of the photos will have everything in the frame seemingly out of focus and some may have the head in focus and rest of body out of focus and immediate area around bird slightly out of focus at F9-F11. I considered that I was cropping too much and had pixel peeping / expectations problem, but some photos are wildly out of focus when supposedly focusing on eye or body. Neither photo below is cropped. Ideas are welcome!

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Agreed, but it's ancient thinking. Any modern forum lets you edit whenever. It's simply a setting they could click to turn off. It's one reason I won't post many photos here. After 10 minutes I lose complete control over my own property. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...