Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I live in North Carolina and have always delt with Amazon in purchasing my higher end photo items and computer equipment. Up until fairly recently, Amazon did not charge NC customers NC state tax on items but have started doing so. I want to purchase a new Sony 70-200 G lens that runs about $1500 but the tax alone on this is over $100! That hurts. I love dealing with Amazon because of thier generous return policy and prompt honest service, but now with this added on tax, it's becoming less attractive.

Does anyone out there know of another good honest vendor of photo gear that yould carry this lens but will not charge me the NC state tax?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try any other out of state camera store (beach camera, Adorama, b&h, etc.).

 

I know how you feel. I live in NY. So every great sale at Adorama or B&H I have to add like $200 to the sale price just for tax. It's a killer when I know I can order the same thing from an out of state store like Beach Camera and not pay tax.

 

Also, try https://www.greentoe.com. It's supposedly some new camera gear reverse auction site that guys are getting great deals on. You set the price you want to pay for the lens or gear, and the stores either accept your offer or give you a counter offer. Might be able to save even more money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When your untaxed lens gets stolen maybe there won't be a viable police dept and judicial system because you didn't contribute to the social contract. 

 

You owe a tax whether the retailer charges it. 

 

The Customer’s Responsibility

In cases where the online retailer does not have to collect sales tax, it is the customer’s responsibility to pay the tax—in which case it is known not as a sales tax but, rather, a “use tax.” The DOR has a webpage providing basic guidance on the use tax, as well as a FAQ page on the use tax. The DOR’s basic guidance states that “Out-of-state retailers that are not ‘engaged in business’ in this State cannot be required to collect North Carolina's tax,” and that such retailers include out-of-state businesses selling over the Internet. Similarly, the FAQ page mentions that items purchased on the Internet may be subject to use tax.

For additional information, you can check the use tax statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. 105-164.6

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

$1500 +$100 seems like a good deal.

 

In Australia we pay +10% on anything that gets ordered in from overseas.  If it is LESS than $900 the government does not care.  Anything above that you pay tax (called GST). GST gets applied to anything you might be renting too...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...