Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From SAR

 

 

A person I highly trust talked to a major Sony manager (I cannot unveil his name). Now as usual the info spilled out by such “managers” have to be taken with a grain of salt too. They often “hide” or sometimes even really don’t know exactly what’s going to happen in the near future. But the info he shared was the following:

1) Many FE lenses have a larger Filter size because it’s more practical for video usage. And Sony wants to make lenses that can suite well both kind of customers: Stills and Video photographers

2) A High End E-mount FF (rumored to be named “A9″) is indeed on the roadmap for a 2015 release. But he doesn’t think it will be announced from here to March. Before the A9 Sony will announce the price and release of the new FE lenses.

3) In the Sony managers region (can’t name it but it’s big) 80% of the interchangeable cameras they sell are E-mount and only 20% A-mount. Most A-mount cameras sold are A99’s.

4) According to him Zeiss, Sigma, Tamron and other third-party lens makers have more interest in making lenses for the E than for the A-mount system. Mainly because the E-system has little to offer while there are plenty of A-mount lenses around.

5) A-mount sales are just enough to cover initial development costs. While the money is coming from E-mount.

6) There will be new and “updated” A-mount lenses that will mainly focus on improving the lens usefulness in video.

I repeat it. Take that info with a grain of salt. But this is the kind of info that the manager (and likely other too) are spreading around when talking with customers and business partners.

 

Your opinion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn.  Yeah, A-mount is dead,  Much to my and thousands of others chargin. Once the money dries up or becomes less profitable, that's the sign.  Big corporations don't have "loyalty" to loosing money.  Just like how we KNOW the 100+ year old SLR technology is super dead, in 20 years, you think SLT will still be around? Mirrorless is the way of the future I suppose.  Guess it's time to get that LA-EA4 to hold me over. Now give me a A7S-II with ISBS, Dual memory cards, and GPS and I'll shut up about A-mount Sony. And hurry up with the A7000 too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Right! The SLR exists because it provided a direct view of the film plane, sensor now. The modern Live view of the sensor output is even more useful and as it's nearly as good already the SLR is pretty well doomed.

 

 Jusr progress folks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope the A mount stays around for awhile. I just bought my first A mount body and 2 lenses. I like it, so I'm about to sell my Nikon 16-85(which I never use)to have the funds to get the Tokina 11-16 in Sony A mount. And I wanna get a couple more lenses for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Sony will bring out successor to the A99 within the year. The A99 and A77ii are both good cameras and with the recent SSM II lens upgrades they should have a new body to go with the lenses.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the long term, SLT might be dead and mirrorless is the future.

But A mount is still the better mount. As long as size is not really critical A mount is better. Especially for high focal length and larger aperture. BTW: Good lenses are rather big and heavy. Always. E mount, too. Saving 100g on the body doesn't make that much sense and holding a a7 is less comfortable for me than a a57 or a77 for example. So mirrorless A mount but body in DSLR size is very good option. Long life A mount!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

If Sigma & Co bring more Lenses for E-mount on the market- the E-mount camaras will  become more interesting for the user - it will boost the process that has already begun- the changing of the ratio between DSLR and the mirrorless. Maybe the prices for native E-mount lenses will become more realistic too- let's hope and see....and make nice pictures:-)

 

So- keep on shooting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

if A-Mount is not still dead, it is in deep coma.

 

May be, there will be one camera again, just right to schedule a slow death, that will not be painless for those who have spent a lot of money in those lenses.

 

Olympus for first and then Sony have anticipated the future.

Canon and Nikon are in very serious delay and perhaps have definitely lost the train.

What is NOW their great strength: an immense park of objectives, risks becoming their halter.

The question is: will they built a mirroless maintaining their current mount? so nullifying the advantages of a compact system.

Or will they re-design all of their lenses in order to adapt them at the new size? thus displeasing millions of fans who will find themselves having to rebuild their equipment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...