Jump to content

Suggestion(s)


Aldowski
 Share

Recommended Posts

There's already number of good topics, must say that, by aspects, those are defined well and, even not structured some other way(s), it's visible that there is creative "environment" with suggestions about specific cameras and lenses being used in different situations; then; technical details "environment" with lot's of info about user's experiences, also there is a kind of "helpdesk" with detailed, full description answers to problems for specified bodies and lenses.

 

If that's possible, I may suggest the topic "Why I moved to Sony". It may be interesting to hear those opinions and experiences. I had Fujifilm mirrorless, bridge camera (and, still have it), then I bought two Sony camera's, different level, have to say both are great, still have them.

 

Also, as I already mentioned at different topic; probably the section Gallery can be improved (with additional 100% zoom option; for example).

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Years ago, when I bought my first Sony; A3000; I had very sharp discussion with few colleagues at work (Nikon and Canon "fighters"); as they were sure "100%" that "mirror rules", "mirrorless will never go mainstream" or "mirrorless will always be just experiment" and so on. In moments (funny) discussion(s) went bad, arguments lost, reasonable thinking out. Have to say, admit, I did enjoy. Especially years later, when both "bighshots" Nikon and Canon went strongly to mirrorless market. Of course, I told those colleagues the famous "I told you so" (as they fully deserved that). I already bought Sony A7ii; have some significant experience with both of those mentioned cameras, going thru learning curves thru menus, processes, steps.

Both Nikon and Canon went to the mirrorless "world" with significant delays. Canon was more conservative; the company has some features available only (during years) when using 3rd party software (Magic Lantern, for example).

Many companies are not immediately ready for improvements or great steps forward, Sony has some limitations as well, but it's not so conservative as other two, Canon and Nikon. For me, for example, relatively simple option to add some note to specific or each photo (at field, when taking photos), in text or in voice, would be great. That feature with Voice Recognition? Yes. Some dialogue with camera when changing lenses, for example, camera recognized the lens is being changed and "unknown" (classic, manual) lens being attached, it "asks" which lens is now mounted (maybe some check like: "Do you mean this one?"), add the name to the filenames of photos, when that lens is in use. 

In IT industry, those "dialogs" are not something new.

So, why not to expect something like = you ask camera to show filtered gallery from this date to that date, photos being taken only with specified lenses?

Too much?

Maybe, to rephrase the question, who will be the first to implement (something like) that? Sony? Or Nikon? Maybe, Canon?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no way to answer your question(s) -- Which company will introduce what feature and when?  If you look at the history of cameras, you will see the answer -- every company, and not just the "major" ones, have introduced ground-breaking features (that we now consider "basic") when they were able to.  The same will be true in the future -- and every other camera company will sooner or later provide the same feature, assuming it helps sales.  (There were plenty of dead-ends along the way -- like disc cameras or APS)

For higher end digital cameras, Canon currently has about 50% of the market/sales, Sony about 25%, and Nikon 12%.  The remaining 13% are divided up by the rest.  (Lens are a similar but different story).

There's no way to predict the future with 100% accuracy -- just ask the Hurricane predictors or Tornado chasers.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying about predictions, precise word would be (technical) expectations. Yes, I am in IT engineering and must say that if there is any working environment (existing now) with large expectations, that's definitely IT.

The "dialog" with camera (software) may look very complicated, not easy or even not possible at the moment; anyway, I would expect it to be realized in steps (a bit similar to autonomous car driving, which is far more, to say, dangerous if not working properly, in fact, cannot be compared).

At the moment; there are programming tools (languages) defined to make "dialogues"; best response to provided requests (and that may not be AI every time, it may be just simple programming). Would not go deep into the structure of it now, just to mention, some level of effort is needed to achieve great results.

I can see Sony was breaking barriers many times, somehow it may be done by Sony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Aldowski said:

Maybe, to rephrase the question, who will be the first to implement (something like) that? Sony? Or Nikon? Maybe, Canon?

 

Call it "expectation" or "prediction".  It's all the same and just semantics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • Have you used and compared the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with the 2X teleconverter to the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS for birds and other wildlife?  I'm considering the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS (I already have the 2x teleconverter) to replace the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS. I've scoured the web but can't find many helpful direct comparisons.  Application, Environment and Background Info I walk 10-20 kilometres every morning on the southwest coast of British Columbia. It's winter, and in my area that means it's dark and dreary with lots or rain. There are all kinds of birds, from Bald Eagles to Swallows, Hummingbirds and plenty of shorebirds, with many passing through on their migratory paths.  I carry an A1 and FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS and an A7 IV with a FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS or FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II for closer opportunities and landscapes.  I'm happy with the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS when the light is good, but I'm in the middle of six months of this rainy season, so I'm usually shooting at 600 mm, f/6.3, 1/500 sec for stationary subjects, and 1/2000-1/4000 for things on the move. My ISO is often above 6400.  I don't use a tripod or monopod. I'm always on the move. I frequently crop to 200%.  I rarely do videos. I don't shoot sports. The FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS serves me well for large birds like Bald Eagles when the light is good.  Although I'm almost always at the long end (600 mm) of the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS, I use the zoom when a large bird approaches or for distant landscapes. I don't mind the weight of carrying two cameras with these lenses. Things I hope to change or improve Greater agility with a lighter, shorter lens I struggle to move the lens fast enough to catch swallows and other small birds in flight. I do much better with the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II, but I can't fill the frame with that lens.  I can sometimes keep up with those smaller, faster birds, even with the 2x teleconverter, but I still want more reach. Exploring with the 300 mm, fast prime lens I like the idea of expanding my photography as I look for subjects I can capture at 300mm at f/2.8 (people and pet portraits outside, musical acts on stage). Although I have tended to use zoom lenses (FE PZ 16-35 MM F4 G, FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS, FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II), I got the FE 50mm F1.2 GM and have enjoyed having to work with the fixed focal length and how that leads me in different directions. I wonder if I would find the same thing with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS. Depth of Field and Bokeh I'm unsure if the shallow depth of field and bokeh will make a big difference for me. But I may find that these attributes present new opportunities like the FE 50mm F1.2 GM. Here's what I think will happen. I'll use the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS without the teleconverter on dreary days. I have used the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II (sometimes with the 2X teleconverter) for those days. I'll use the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with the 2X teleconverter when there's better light.  Expectations of the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with 2X teleconverter  The focus accuracy and speed with the 2X teleconverter will match or better the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  The image quality will be at least as good as the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  I'm happy with the image quality using the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and 2X teleconverter and can tolerate the slightly slower focus speed. I imagine the results will be similar with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS but at least as good or better than the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  It will be easier to track small birds in flight with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with 2X teleconverter (1675 grams) vs FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (2115 grams). The difference is 340 grams (12 oz) and 5.1 cm in length. That should make a difference, right?  Questions Have you tried both? What are your experiences? Will you keep the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS? Are my expectations realistic? Thanks for reading and thinking about this with me.
    • One post hit and run.  They must have figured it out. 
    • Other than your disapproval of the stripes.... they're kinda cool. 🫣
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...